Occupational Physicians Comment on Proposed Ergonomics Standard

March 9, 2000
The American College of Occupational and Enviornmental Medicine supports the premise of an ergonomics standard, but offers a number of recommendations and changes to OSHA's proposal.

The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) said it recognizes the problem of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) in the workplace and supports the premise of an ergonomics standard.

However, in its written comments to OSHA, ACOEM presented a number of recommendations and changes to the agency's proposed standard.

ACOEM said it encourages OSHA to adopt an ergonomics program that is limited to those disorders for which credible scientific evidence exists and where detection and elimination of hazards will result in a reduction in the number of disorders.

"OSHA should take into consideration that MSDs represent a heterogeneous group of conditions," ACOEM said in its comments. "Since it can be difficult to determine if an MSD is related to an individual's job duties, ACOEM urges OSHA to limit the focus of the rule to work-related MSDs -- only those that are directly related to physical activities performed at work."

OSHA's proposed standard requires that the employer be responsible for determining if an illness or injury is the result of job duties.

However, since the triggers in the ergonomics standard are more difficult to define and to determine the cause of injury (such as carpal tunnel and low back pain), ACOEM recommend that a medical diagnosis be the basis for determining if an MSD is reportable.

An important component of OSHA's proposed standard is the requirement that employers make "MSD management" available whenever a covered MSD occurs.

ACOEM agrees with OSHA that employers should ensure injured employees are provided prompt access to health care professionals.

However, the group strongly urged OSHA to require that treatment programs and all work restrictions protection determinations "be based on a medical diagnosis made by a licensed physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant in those states where they are licensed for independent practice."

Finally, ACOEM noted in its comments that OSHA's proposed solution, designed to permit small employers to find an expensive and fast solution for a single work-related MSD incident, is problematic.

ACOEM recommended that OSHA "revise the quick-fix solution to encourage a workplace assessment by professionals trained in ergonomics, industrial hygiene, or safety engineering to determine if the hazard has actually been fixed."

In addition, ACOEM suggested that employees reporting acute, persistent and recurrent signs and symptoms suggestive of work-related MSDs should be provided access to a physician to provide an evaluation and diagnosis if signs and symptoms of MSD continue.

Sponsored Recommendations

ISO 45001: Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems (OHSMS)

March 28, 2024
ISO 45001 certification – reduce your organizational risk and promote occupational health and safety (OHS) by working with SGS to achieve certification or migrate to the new standard...

Want to Verify your GHG Emissions Inventory?

March 28, 2024
With the increased focus on climate change, measuring your organization’s carbon footprint is an important first action step. Our Green House Gas (GHG) verification services provide...

Download Free ESG White Paper

March 28, 2024
The Rise and Challenges of ESG – Your Journey to Enhanced Sustainability, Brand and Investor Potential

Free Webinar: Mining & ESG: The Sustainability Mandate

March 28, 2024
Participants in this webinar will understand the business drivers and challenges of ESG and sustainability performance, the 5 steps of the ESG and sustainability cycle, and prioritized...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!