Insurance Industry Says It Might Not Cover Future Terrorist Attacks

Representatives from the insurance industry testify in California that despite their quick response to Sept. 11, they might not be able to cover the cost of future terrorist attacks.

The insurance industry has been quick to respond to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in New York, Washington, D.C., and Pennsylvania, but the victims of any future attacks might not be so lucky, representatives of the insurance industry yesterday told members of the California Assembly Insurance Committee. The committee members wanted to know what the industry''s response would be if a terrorist attack like the ones in New York or Washington occurred in California.

Insurance representatives noted that the Sept. 11 attack was unique in several ways: It was the largest insured loss from a man-made disaster and it deeply impacted all lines of coverage - including property and casualty, workers'' compensation and life insurance.

"Despite personal losses, the insurance industry responded immediately to the attack by dispatching hundreds of personnel to Ground Zero," noted Diane Colborn, vice president of legislative and regulatory affairs for the Personal Insurance Federation of California.

"Insurers were processing and paying claims on day one and will continue to assist policyholders as long as necessary from their catastrophe vans in Battery Park,'''' Colborn added.

She said that insurers are processing more than 19,000 claims so far and that the number of claims is growing daily. She estimates that the total insured losses could reach a staggering $30 to $70 billion.

"As the country moves forward we must plan and prepare for future terrorist attacks," said Mark Webb, American Insurance Association (AIA) state affairs vice president. "Reinsurers and primary insurers are no longer able to offer coverage for terrorism. Businesses in Visalia and Chicago are all potentially at risk for terrorism."

Insurers cannot absorb this infinite risk with their finite resources, Webb told lawmakers, adding, "The industry cannot accurately predict loss, plan reserves or price their product. It is vital that Congress enact a federal mechanism to restore predictability and give insurers the tools necessary to return to the terrorism insurance market."

The attacks on September 11 "[were] the largest disaster in history for life and workers'' compensation insurers," said Janine Gibford, legislative advocate for the Association of California Insurance Companies. She noted the risk associated with Sept. 11 was spread across all lines and several companies and no one entity took the brunt of the losses. The industry is well capitalized, she said, and will be able to "quickly and fully" meet the needs of policyholders.

"No insurance company has invoked exclusions for war or acts of terrorism. The financial questions facing the industry are about future claims, not claims resulting from Sept. 11," Gibford noted.

by Sandy Smith ([email protected])

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish