Automotive Service Association Asks OSHA to Consider the 'Economic Burdens' of Proposed Hex Chrome Standard on Collision Repairers

Jan. 20, 2005
With public hearings on OSHA's proposed hexavalent chromium standard less than two weeks away, stakeholders are weighing in on the subject.

The Bedford, Texas-based Automotive Service Association (ASA), in its comments submitted to OSHA, says the agency needs to consider the potential financial impact of a new hexavalent chromium standard on its collision members.

"ASA asks the agency to re-evaluate the potential economic burdens for collision repairers if this proposed regulation were to move forward in its current form," the trade organization said in its comments to OSHA. "What is not entirely clear in the economic impact analysis of the proposal is whether the agency considered the cost of new equipment, the cost of physical alterations/additions, the cost of additional technical training and the cost of additional staff hours to comply with the proposed regulations, i.e. recordkeeping and medical monitoring."

The ASA's collision members use refinishing products in the repair of vehicles. Sanding of some vehicle parts, grinding and limited welding could also present opportunities for the proposed new exposure standard to be triggered.

"Collision repairers have taken a leadership role in establishing a voluntary national training organization, the Inter-Industry Conference on Auto Collision Repair (I-CAR), to assure that technical staffers have the most up-to-date repair and safety information available," the ASA said in its comments to OSHA. "ASA is the founder of the Automotive Management Institute (AMI), which encourages best management practices and workplace safety.

"ASA encourages the agency to fully evaluate the economic burdens placed on automotive repairers by this proposed regulation."

OSHA is proposing to lower its permissible exposure limit for hexavalent chromium (Cr[VI]) and for all Cr(VI) compounds in construction, shipyards and general industry from 52 to 1 microgram of Cr(VI) per cubic meter of air (1 µg/m3) as an 8-hour time weighted average. The proposed rule also includes provisions for employee protection such as preferred methods for controlling exposure; respiratory protection; protective work clothing and equipment; hygiene areas and practices; medical surveillance; hazard communication; and recordkeeping.

Cr(VI) compounds are widely used in the chemical industry in pigments, metal plating and chemical synthesis as ingredients and catalysts. Cr(VI) also can be produced when welding on stainless steel or Cr(VI)-painted surfaces. The major health effects associated with exposure to Cr(VI) include lung cancer; asthma; nasal septum ulcerations and perforations; skin ulcerations (or chrome holes); and allergic and irritant contact dermatitis, according to OSHA.

Sponsored Recommendations

ISO 45001: Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems (OHSMS)

March 28, 2024
ISO 45001 certification – reduce your organizational risk and promote occupational health and safety (OHS) by working with SGS to achieve certification or migrate to the new standard...

Want to Verify your GHG Emissions Inventory?

March 28, 2024
With the increased focus on climate change, measuring your organization’s carbon footprint is an important first action step. Our Green House Gas (GHG) verification services provide...

Download Free ESG White Paper

March 28, 2024
The Rise and Challenges of ESG – Your Journey to Enhanced Sustainability, Brand and Investor Potential

Free Webinar: Mining & ESG: The Sustainability Mandate

March 28, 2024
Participants in this webinar will understand the business drivers and challenges of ESG and sustainability performance, the 5 steps of the ESG and sustainability cycle, and prioritized...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!