House Leaders Want Cintas Inquiry

March 12, 2007
Congressional leaders sent a letter to OSHA Administrator Edwin Foulke Jr. urging him to to call for a full investigation into the safety hazards at industrial laundry facilities owned by Cintas Corp., following the March 6 death of a worker.

In the letter, U.S. Reps. Lynn Woolsey, D-Calif., Phil Hare, D-Ill., Tim Bishop, D-N.Y., and other Democratic members of the House Committee on Education and Labor's Workforce Protections Subcommittee urge Foulke to “undertake immediate investigation of all Cintas laundries – both in federal jurisdiction and in those covered by state plans.”

The legislators want to know if all Cintas facilities have the same faulty equipment that caused the death of Eleazar Torres-Gomez, who became trapped in an industrial dryer for at least 20 minutes after he was dragged in by a large robotic conveyor used to transfer uniforms from washers to dryers. (For more, read “Unions Demand OSHA Probe of Cintas.”)

They also want to know what measures OSHA has in place to ensure that serious health and safety problems identified at the Cintas facility in Tulsa, Okla., are not repeated in the company's facilities across the United States.

“What happened on Tuesday is a moral outrage,” Woolsey said. “OSHA has the responsibility to immediately undertake a full and complete investigation into how, after repeated citations for safety violations, these conditions were allowed to continue. They must ensure that the same safety standards are enforced naturally.”

A call made to OSHA was not immediately returned.

According to the letter, OSHA inspectors were called in to investigate the company's Central Islip, N.Y., facility at the request of employees after OSHA's Directorate of Compliance issued a special interpretation letter on July 7, 2005, alerting employers and workers about the need for special protection from robotic laundry shuttle equipment such as the ones used in Cintas' Tulsa plant. OSHA cited the plant for various violations, but it wasn't until May 2006 that Cintas fixed the violations by installing guarding technology to protect workers, the House representatives allege.

The letter states that “it would appear, however, that Cintas failed to address the same deadly hazards in its Tulsa plant.”

“The fact that someone died simply doing their job is unconscionable,” Hare said. “I am deeply troubled that Cintas was forewarned that such a tragedy should occur.”

Sponsored Recommendations

3 Essential Elements for a Strong Safety Culture

March 13, 2024
Organizations globally have increased their attention on safety culture: trying to figure out what it really is and the aspects that are necessary to develop and sustain it. And...

Making the Case for Occupational Health Software

March 13, 2024
Deciding to invest in Occupational Health (OH) software can be a challenging leap for many organizations. This article will equip businesses with insightful strategies for effectively...

Fighting the Flu: Solutions for the Workplace

March 13, 2024
Seasonal flu continues to wreak considerable havoc both on individual wellness, as well as on our business continuity and productivity. Explore these solutions for protecting ...

Preventing SIFs with Digitization: Reduce Serious Injuries and Fatalities with Technology

March 13, 2024
This eBook discusses the origins of SIF prevention, outlines principles, models and tools available to EHS leaders to better detect and address SIF potential in their business...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!