ASSE: Improving Safety Culture Through Measurement

June 10, 2004
By measuring primarily injury and illness data, most safety managers are looking at the wrong things and hindering the achievement of genuine safety excellence, according to consultant Robert Ryan, president of Safety Metrics Inc., who spoke at a June 8 concurrent session of the American Society of Safety Engineers' Professional Development Conference and Exposition in Las Vegas.

Understanding the difference between measuring safety performance as opposed to mere safety activity or injury and illness performance was Ryan's major theme. He said there are two key questions that must be asked in order measure the effectiveness of any safety activity:

  • Why are we doing this?
  • What are we trying to achieve?

For example, too often safety managers think the way to evaluate the effectiveness of safety meetings is to measure how many workers show up. Not so, contended Ryan. "If it's an ineffective meeting, the fewer who show up the better," he declared.

Ryan suggested defining the desired outcome of safety meetings, and then using employee surveys to measure the outcome. The person conducting the meeting then needs to be given the results, so that he or she can be encouraged to improve.

Ryan argued that the desired outcomes of the overall safety program should be defined, including such elements as management's leadership and commitment to safety, employees' attitudes and motivation to work safely, communication and feedback effectiveness, safety and health training and employee ownership and involvement in safety. In addition, all safety programs and initiatives that are part of the company's culture should be measured for effectiveness: incentive and recognition programs, employee suggestion programs, incident investigations, audits and inspections, management of change and safety meetings.

"Lastly, you must include the measuring of employee behaviors at all levels of the organization," said Ryan. "Don't leave out management or supervision."

The biggest payoff of measuring safety performance, according to Ryan, is that it will change a company's culture and encourage employees to take ownership of the safety program.

"What will employees think if they get no measurement of safety performance, but they do get measured for production?" Ryan queried. He also pointed out that if the only safety measures are those of failure, e.g. injuries, illness, and fatalities, it might also be likely to send the wrong message.

"We need to measure performance in order to maximize human potential and create the motivation to change," Ryan contended.

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!