MSHA Applauds Court's DPM Decision

Feb. 27, 2007
Calling it "a major victory for the nation's metal and nonmetal underground miners," MSHA is praising a recent court decision that denies a petition made by several mining companies and trade associations to review the agency's rule on diesel particulate matter (DPM).

On Feb. 9, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit concluded that MSHA demonstrated that DPM presents a significant risk to the health and safety of miners and that the agency provided more than enough evidence that mine operators can feasibly comply with the new standards.

"Exposure to diesel particulate matter is a significant public health concern, and the court determined that all aspects of MSHA's standard were supported," MSHA Administrator Richard Stickler said. "This decision ensures that we can move forward with enhanced protection for miners who work with diesel equipment underground."

Mining Firms, Other Stakeholders Challenged DPM Rule

The DPM rule, first promulgated in 2001, set an interim exposure limit of 400 micrograms per cubic of air, which was to become effective in July 2002. It set a final limit of 160 micrograms per cubic meter of air, which was to become effective in January 2006.

The rule was challenged by the Anglogold Corp. and Kennecott Greens Creek Mining Co.; the Georgia Mining Association; the National Mining Association; the Salt Institute; the Methane Awareness Resource Group ("MARG") Diesel Coalition; and Getchell Gold Corp.

MSHA examined the rule and agreed to undertake further rulemaking. In 2005, MSHA changed the surrogate metric used to measure DPM from "total carbon" to "elemental carbon" for the interim limit. In addition, the rule was amended to allow the use of respirators when engineering controls could not feasibly meet the DPM limits.

The National Mining Association alleged that the agency should not have based the rule on a calculation that allowed industry to comply with the new limits by using new clean-diesel engines, as the trade association noted that use of such engines could actually increase exposure to dangerous nanoparticles.

The court, however, held that it was reasonable for MSHA to regulate for the known risks of DPM while conducting research into the potential health effects of nanoparticles.

2006 Rule Retained Final Limit Set in 2001

The 2006 rule retained the final limit set in 2001, and gave the mining industry until May 20, 2008, to comply with that limit. Additionally, the 2006 rule provided medical evaluations for miners required to wear respirators and transfer rights to other existing jobs for miners unable to wear a respirator.

MSHA also stated that it would change the surrogate metric from total carbon to elemental carbon for the final limit.

Sponsored Recommendations

ISO 45001: Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems (OHSMS)

March 28, 2024
ISO 45001 certification – reduce your organizational risk and promote occupational health and safety (OHS) by working with SGS to achieve certification or migrate to the new standard...

Want to Verify your GHG Emissions Inventory?

March 28, 2024
With the increased focus on climate change, measuring your organization’s carbon footprint is an important first action step. Our Green House Gas (GHG) verification services provide...

Download Free ESG White Paper

March 28, 2024
The Rise and Challenges of ESG – Your Journey to Enhanced Sustainability, Brand and Investor Potential

Work Safety Tips: 5 Tactics to Build Employee Engagement for Workplace Safety

March 13, 2024
Employee safety engagement strategies have become increasingly key to fostering a safer workplace environment. But, how exactly do you encourage employee buy-in when it comes ...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!