ASSE Supports Ergonomics Standard, Questions OSHA Proposal

March 7, 2000
The American Society of Safety Engineers said an ergonmics standard is needed, but outlined several concerns with the proposal in its comment letter to OSHA.

In its comments filed last week to OSHA on the agency's proposed ergonomics standard, the American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE) said a standard is needed, but outlined several concerns with the proposal.

Sparked by the possibility that the current negative debates being waged countrywide on the issue could result in total rejection of a standard, ASSE provided a counterproposal in its comments.

Based on input from its 33,000 members, ASSE believes its counterproposal offers a more reasonable and user-friendly approach to the control of workplace muscloskeletal disorders (MSD) and ergonomic exposures than the current OSHA proposal.

"This proposed standard can be of significant benefit to employees, employers, professional safety and health organizations, and the country overall if and when it is finalized," said ASSE President Frank Perry in a letter to OSHA.

"ASSE will continue to support OSHA in the creation of a feasible ergonomic standard, based on good science and sound technology, which will benefit all stakeholders, however, we urge OSHA to consider our counterproposal in an effort to assure that an effective standard is adopted."

Perry cited the fact that many of ASSE's members, who work for all types of industries, have developed and implemented ergonomic safety programs that have led to significant decreases in the number of workplace MSDs.

"In light of this fact and others, we believe that OSHA should consider a more incremental approach to the ergonomics issue and promulgating a standard," said Perry.

Perry suggested the agency could promulgate a regulation addressing lifting and back injuries followed by other workplace MSD standards and regulations.

In its proposal, ASSE suggests that OSHA consider utilizing the Meat Packing Guidelines as a basic approach that can later be strengthened when the agency obtains more scientific and technical data on effective workplace MSD intervention controls.

ASSE is also urging OSHA to develop a more reasonable standard which enhances occupational safety and health, and leave the issue of payment for rehabilitation, social issues and workers' compensation reengineering to the existing federal and state laws and regulations governing these areas.

ASSE believes that the 'one case' trigger called for in the standard is poor policy because many ergonomic problems arise off-the-job and in the absence of a clear triggering incident.

"Getting at the root cause is extremely problematic. If the cause is not in the workplace, trying to fix the workplace will not reduce or eliminate injuries," said Perry.

Perry noted that OSHA's proposal, as written, is cumbersome, confusing and unclear because it does not adequately explain what the standard actually requires for 1) a workplace ergonomic program, 2) the standard of proof to establish the program, and 3) how the workers restriction/payment portions of the standard will do anything to prevent workplace MSDs.

The proposal, Perry said, also needs to better focus on overall safety and health issues and not shift the focus to compliance with ergonomics.

"We believe it would be poor policy to allow ergonomics to become the primary driver of a safety and health program," said Perry.

In its comments, ASSE urges OSHA to promulgate this as a safety standard, not as a health standard as they are proposing to do.

"We believe that ergonomic injuries should not be treated in a different manner than other workplace injuries."

ASSE's comments on the proposal and a copy of its counterproposal are posted at www.asse.org

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

Committing to Safety: Why Leadership’s Role in Safety Excellence is Key

Jan. 13, 2025
Leadership has the power to transform an organization through their behavior and vision, which can result in the creation of an organizational culturethat supports safety excellence...

Speak Up! Cementing "See Something, Say Something" to Drive Safety

Jan. 13, 2025
Many organizations promote "see something, say something" to encourage their people to intervene and make work safe. But most don't go far enough to equip teams with the skills...

The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease

Jan. 13, 2025
DEKRA announces its latest white paper, “The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease,” as a definitive look into why being vulnerable to incidents strengthens our commitment...

Mitigating Risks: Strategies for Safeguarding Workers in Hazardous Workplaces

Jan. 13, 2025
Join our expert team in taking on the challenge to make safety part of your organization’s DNA as work, the workforce, and workplaces evolve.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!