Health Groups Want New Standard for Soot Particles

July 25, 2001
The health threat from tiny soot particles is so grave that EPA\r\nshould adopt a tougher new short-term standard to protect public\r\nhealth, said a\r\ncoalition led by the American Lung Association.

The health threat from tiny soot particles is so grave that EPA should adopt a tougher new short-term standard to protect public health while retaining the longer-term standard adopted in 1997, a coalition led by the American Lung Association (ALA) testified today.

Recent scientific studies confirm that tiny soot particles, produced chiefly by motor vehicles and electric power plants, are linked to premature death and serious lung disease, the health coalition said.

Infants and children -- especially those with asthma -- the elderly, and people with heart or lung disease are especially vulnerable.

Anthony J. DeLucia, Ph.D., president-elect of the ALA and a faculty member of East Tennessee State University''s College of Medicine, testified for the coalition before a panel of EPA scientific advisors.

EPA is reviewing a summary of scientific literature about fine particle soot compiled by EPA scientists, a preliminary step as EPA re-examines its current health standards.

The agency set new particle soot standards in 1997 despite opposition from industry groups that claimed EPA had overstated the scientific basis for the standards.

DeLucia noted that "hundreds of studies published in the last five years support EPA''s 1997 decision" to set new standards for fine-particle soot.

"The research leaves no room to weaken the air quality standards in 1997, and indeed, makes a strong case that the short-term fine particle standard needs to be strengthened," he said.

DeLucia specifically noted that:

  • Recent studies had re-examined and validated studies -- that EPA relied on in 1997 -- which linked fine particle soot to premature death;
  • Six dozen new short-term studies from across the United States and around the world "confirm the effects of particle pollution on premature mortality, hospital admissions, emergency department visits, doctor''s visits, respiratory and cardiac effects;"
  • New studies "demonstrate that infants and children, especially asthmatic children, the elderly, and those with heart or lung disease are especially sensitive to the effects of fine particle pollution."
  • New research addresses the major industry arguments against the standards and found other factors do not reduce or eliminate the adverse effects of particle pollution.

DeLucia also called on EPA to set a meaningful new "coarse" particle standard to prevent health damage from bigger, but still respirable, chunks of soot.

In addition to ALA, the health coalition includes the American Public Health Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America and numerous environmental and public interest groups including the Sierra Club, U.S. Public Interest Research Group, National Environmental Trust and Clean Air Trust Education Fund.

by Virginia Foran

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

10 Facts About the State of Workplace Safety in the U.S.

July 12, 2024
Workplace safety in the U.S. has improved over the past 50 years, but progress has recently stalled. This report from the AFL-CIO highlights key challenges.

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!