Health Groups Want New Standard for Soot Particles

July 25, 2001
The health threat from tiny soot particles is so grave that EPA\r\nshould adopt a tougher new short-term standard to protect public\r\nhealth, said a\r\ncoalition led by the American Lung Association.

The health threat from tiny soot particles is so grave that EPA should adopt a tougher new short-term standard to protect public health while retaining the longer-term standard adopted in 1997, a coalition led by the American Lung Association (ALA) testified today.

Recent scientific studies confirm that tiny soot particles, produced chiefly by motor vehicles and electric power plants, are linked to premature death and serious lung disease, the health coalition said.

Infants and children -- especially those with asthma -- the elderly, and people with heart or lung disease are especially vulnerable.

Anthony J. DeLucia, Ph.D., president-elect of the ALA and a faculty member of East Tennessee State University''s College of Medicine, testified for the coalition before a panel of EPA scientific advisors.

EPA is reviewing a summary of scientific literature about fine particle soot compiled by EPA scientists, a preliminary step as EPA re-examines its current health standards.

The agency set new particle soot standards in 1997 despite opposition from industry groups that claimed EPA had overstated the scientific basis for the standards.

DeLucia noted that "hundreds of studies published in the last five years support EPA''s 1997 decision" to set new standards for fine-particle soot.

"The research leaves no room to weaken the air quality standards in 1997, and indeed, makes a strong case that the short-term fine particle standard needs to be strengthened," he said.

DeLucia specifically noted that:

  • Recent studies had re-examined and validated studies -- that EPA relied on in 1997 -- which linked fine particle soot to premature death;
  • Six dozen new short-term studies from across the United States and around the world "confirm the effects of particle pollution on premature mortality, hospital admissions, emergency department visits, doctor''s visits, respiratory and cardiac effects;"
  • New studies "demonstrate that infants and children, especially asthmatic children, the elderly, and those with heart or lung disease are especially sensitive to the effects of fine particle pollution."
  • New research addresses the major industry arguments against the standards and found other factors do not reduce or eliminate the adverse effects of particle pollution.

DeLucia also called on EPA to set a meaningful new "coarse" particle standard to prevent health damage from bigger, but still respirable, chunks of soot.

In addition to ALA, the health coalition includes the American Public Health Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America and numerous environmental and public interest groups including the Sierra Club, U.S. Public Interest Research Group, National Environmental Trust and Clean Air Trust Education Fund.

by Virginia Foran

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

Navigating ESG Risk in Your Supply Chain

Sept. 26, 2024
Discover the role of ESG in supply chains, from reducing carbon footprints to complying with new regulations and enhancing long-term business value.

Understanding ESG Risks in the Supply Chain

Sept. 26, 2024
Understand the critical role of ESG in supply chains, the risks for hiring companies, and the competitive edge suppliers gain by prioritizing sustainability.

Best Practices for Managing Subcontractor Risk

Sept. 26, 2024
Discover how to effectively manage subcontractor risk with unified strategies, enhanced oversight, and clear communication for consistent safety and compliance.

Building a Culture of Support: Suicide Prevention and Mental Health in the Workplace

Sept. 26, 2024
Find best practices for setting up an organizational culture that promotes positive mental health and suicide prevention.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!