NRDC: World Trade Center Attacks Created Environmental Emergency

Feb. 20, 2002
The first independent assessment of the environmental response to the World Trade Center disaster offers a dozen recommendations that would help to\r\navoid the environmental missteps that occurred in the aftermath of the World Trade Center attacks.

In the first independent assessment of the environmental response to the World Trade Center disaster, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) offers a dozen recommendations that would help to avoid the environmental missteps that occurred in the aftermath of the World Trade Center attacks.

"Although this crisis brought out the best in New Yorkers, we must do better in overall coordination in any future environmental emergency," said Eric A. Goldstein, NRDC senior attorney and a co-author of the report, "Environmental Impacts of the World Trade Center Attacks."

"The good news here," he continued, "is that outdoor air quality in lower Manhattan is essentially again at pre-attack levels."

According to the report:

  • The terror attacks on the World Trade Center constituted an unprecedented environmental assault for Lower Manhattan. At least 10,000 New Yorkers have suffered short-term health ailments from Trade Center-generated air contaminants.
  • Other than isolated outdoor hotspots, the most worrisome air pollution problem now facing Lower Manhattan involves indoor pollution threats in some residences and offices that received high doses of debris and dust and whose buildings were not properly cleaned. The extent of the remaining indoor pollution is one that is manageable in scope.
  • The overall government response to the environmental health challenges presented by Sept. 11th fell short in several key areas. The report complains of gaps in coordination and leadership; difficulties in communicating environmental information to the public; occupational safety shortcomings at Ground Zero; and problems assisting Lower Manhattan residents on environmental safety and clean-up. Of the more than nine city, state and federal agencies involved in aspects of the environmental health response to the Sept. 11th attacks, the performance of the New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYDEP) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) "were particularly disappointing."

The report offers a comprehensive list of recommendations, including:

  • OSHA, along with appropriate state and city agencies, should immediately undertake stringent enforcement of workplace safety standards for workers at Ground Zero and workers involved in clean up of dust- or debris-filled offices or residences in the vicinity of the Trade Center site.
  • The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the NYDEP and other relevant agencies should immediately create a joint task force to address remaining indoor air problems in Lower Manhattan residences and office buildings.
  • Federal, state and city agencies should act without delay to require the use of low sulfur fuel for diesel trucks and equipment operating in connection with Trade Center recovery, clean-up and rebuilding operations.
  • The federal government should provide additional funding to assist in the completion of recently initiated health studies of the environmental impacts of the Sept. 11th attacks on workers and residents of Lower Manhattan.
  • The federal government should provide funding to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to assist in the establishment of a comprehensive health registry for workers, school children and residents in the Ground Zero vicinity who may have been impacted by the attacks on the World Trade Center.
  • New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg should officially designate the NYDEP to lead and coordinate the response of various government agencies to future environmental emergencies in New York City.
  • Bloomberg and the New York City Council should enact legislation creating a New York City Committee of Environmental Science and Health Advisors to work, in conjunction with the Board of Health, assisting city officials in evaluating information and communicating it to the public during future environmental health emergencies.
  • Bloomberg and the New York City Council should commission an independent assessment of the response of government agencies to the environmental health challenges presented by the Sept. 11th attacks.
  • Congress should enact S.1621 to establish a permanent health monitoring system at disaster sites.
  • EPA should initiate a review of existing national ambient air quality standards with the aim of revising particulate matter standards to account for high-intensity, short-term pollution bursts and of reviewing whether new standards for other pollutants discharged on Sept. 11th are warranted.
  • EPA, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the NYDEP should review New York City''s entire air quality monitoring network with the aim of adding stationary and mobile monitors to the existing system, so as to provide comprehensive monitoring information in future environmental emergencies.
  • The U.S. Congress, the New York State Legislature and EPA should develop and advance legislative proposals to minimize the amount of toxic substances that are used in office products and consumer goods.

The New York City Office of Emergency Management, which coordinated the city''s overall response to the crisis, appeared not to place local environmental effects as high on its priority list as other challenges, according to the study. And although the NYDEP has a broad mandate for dealing with environmental emergencies, the report said the agency "did not rise to the challenges posed by Sept. 11th" or fully exercise its authority.

First responders - firefighters, police, and construction workers - have faced the greatest health risks from the contaminated air, the study found. And in too many cases they have been working without the proper respiratory equipment.

The peer-reviewed study, available at, was researched and written by Megan D. Nordgren, Eric A. Goldstein and Mark A. Izeman. It cautions that a definitive analysis cannot be done until the completion of long-term studies such as those now underway at Columbia University School of Public Health, Mt. Sinai School of Environmental Medicine and the New York University School of Medicine. NRDC plans to release another report in September 2002.

by Sandy Smith ([email protected])

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!