Green Groups, Democrats Denounce Bush Environmental Moves

March 28, 2001
Environmentalists said they are bracing for the Bush White House\r\nto dismantle more environmental protection rules from the Clinton\r\nAdministration.

Environmentalists said they are bracing for the Bush White House to dismantle more environmental protection rules from the Clinton Administration, ranging from caps on mercury emissions to limits on manure from factory farms.

Bush last week suspended tighter standards for gold and silver mining waste and for arsenic in drinking water.

He also reversed a campaign promise to limit the amount of carbon dioxide emissions form power plants, viewed by many scientists as a major cause of global warming.

Bush defended his decision by saying it was necessary to keep U.S. power plants operating at full tilt to provide enough energy.

Any hopes of a moderate approach by the Bush Administration to environmental issues have been dashed, according to some green groups.

"President Bush''s attack on our fish, forest and wildlife is like taking a jack hammer to the Sistine Chapel," said Brian Vincent, California organizer for American Lands.

The Bush Administration''s moves on environment and energy issues are likely to trigger some of the most contentious battles in Congress this year.

Democrats in Congress have joined with their environmental supporters in denouncing the decisions, claiming the energy and mining special interests who supported Bush''s presidency are now rewriting the rules for protecting the environment.

On Thursday, Senate Democrats said Bush had "declared war" on the environment and demanded top agency officials to turn over memos and documents showing why the administration was reversing some environmental rules.

"The decisions to try to rescind the arsenic rule and suspend mining regulation threaten to roll us right back to the Stone Age," said Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman, ranking Democrat on the Senate committee that oversee government regulatory affairs.

Another area of concern is the president''s campaign promise to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas drilling.

The 19-million acre refuge, on Alaska''s northeast coast, is home to polar bears, caribou and other wildlife.

The National Resources Defense Council said it believes other last-minute Clinton actions in the following areas are under attack by the new White House:

  • Protection for wild forests.
  • Appliance efficiency improvements.
  • Air quality in national parks.
  • Protection for wetlands.
  • Limits on ocean discharges.
  • Restrictions on snowmobiles in national parks.
  • Endangered species protections.
  • Reducing factory farm pollution.

Republican sources say that the green groups aren''t fairly assessing the Bush Administration, noting the fact that EPA has left in place a rule issued by the outgoing Clinton Administration to clean up diesel engines and fuel.

They said this past week also saw EPA agree to maintain a court settlement by the Clinton Administration to assess the impact of crop pesticides on children.

by Virginia Sutcliffe

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

Elevating Safety: Empowering Supervisors to Become Safety Advocates

Aug. 27, 2024
Explore the skills, knowledge and techniques that supervisors need to effectively manage the safety of their crew. This guide will examine the causes and symptoms of supervisory...

Top 10 Causes of Distracted Driving—and What They All Have in Common

Aug. 27, 2024
The results reveal the top ten causes of distracted driving, and make it clear that not all distractions are created equal.

Providing the Best PPE is No Guarantee

Aug. 27, 2024
Advancements in PPE are impressive—better protection, comfort and style. But even if you’ve provided the best PPE, there is no guarantee it will be worn.

6 Qualities That Make a Safety Leader

Aug. 27, 2024
A strong safety culture depends on dedicated leaders. They are the people who spearhead the fight for a safer work environment. A good safety leader isn’t shy about bringing concerns...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!