Failure to Protect Workers Leads To Nearly $42,000 In Fines for Connecticut Employer

June 25, 2002
Failure to protect workers against safety and health hazards ranging from unguarded machinery and electrical equipment to deficient respirator and first aid safeguards has resulted in $41,925 in proposed fines against a Seymour, Conn., sporting goods manufacturer.

Thule Inc. was cited by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for alleged serious, repeat and other violations of the Occupational Safety and Health Act following safety and health inspections by OSHA's Bridgeport area office.

The inspections were conducted under an OSHA program that targets workplaces with a higher than average number of workdays lost to on-the-job injuries or illnesses, explained Robert W. Kowalski, OSHA's Bridgeport area director.

Sixteen alleged serious violations account for $33,825 of the proposed fines. Those hazards include moving machine parts not guarded against employee contact, exposed live electrical conductors, no written standard operating procedures for the proper selection and use of respirators, failure to evaluate an employee's physical fitness to wear a respirator, no written control plan to minimize first aid responders' exposure to bloodborne pathogens, improper storage of compressed gas cylinders, and a blocked exit door.

Four alleged repeat violations, with $8,100 in proposed penalties, were issued for excess air pressure in cleaning hoses, no annual inspection of the plant's energy control procedures, misuse of electrical outlet boxes, and inadequate strain relief for power cords. OSHA cited Thule previously for substantially similar violations in 2000 and 2001 following inspections at the company's Franklin Park, Ill., manufacturing plant.

Thule was also cited for 10 alleged other-than-serious violations for inadequacies with workplace hazard evaluation, hazard communication, fire extinguishers, electrical panels and power cords.

OSHA defines a serious violation as one in which there is a substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result, and the employer knew, or should have known, of the hazard. An other-than-serious violation is a condition, which would probably not cause death or serious physical harm but would have a direct and immediate relationship to the safety and health of employees. A repeat citation is issued when an employer has been previously cited for a substantially similar hazard and that citation has become final.

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

Committing to Safety: Why Leadership’s Role in Safety Excellence is Key

Jan. 13, 2025
Leadership has the power to transform an organization through their behavior and vision, which can result in the creation of an organizational culturethat supports safety excellence...

Speak Up! Cementing "See Something, Say Something" to Drive Safety

Jan. 13, 2025
Many organizations promote "see something, say something" to encourage their people to intervene and make work safe. But most don't go far enough to equip teams with the skills...

The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease

Jan. 13, 2025
DEKRA announces its latest white paper, “The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease,” as a definitive look into why being vulnerable to incidents strengthens our commitment...

Mitigating Risks: Strategies for Safeguarding Workers in Hazardous Workplaces

Jan. 13, 2025
Join our expert team in taking on the challenge to make safety part of your organization’s DNA as work, the workforce, and workplaces evolve.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!