Fatal Accident Leads to $52,500 in OSHA Fines for Butte Construction Company

April 1, 2003
The failure of Jim Gilman Excavating Inc., a Butte, Mont. construction company, to protect employees on a construction site from the hazards of working around heavy equipment has resulted in $52,500 in proposed OSHA penalties.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Billings area office issued one willful, and one serious violation following an investigation that began on Sept. 16. An employee was crushed to death beneath the wheels of a road grader at a road construction site near Butte.

Gilman Excavating was cited for one willful violation for allowing employees to ride on the ripper attachment and the cab access steps while the machine was in motion. A $49,000 fine is proposed for this violation.

OSHA also found one serious violation for failure to instruct employees in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and assessed penalties of $3,500 for that violation.

"In this case, the employer was well aware of the hazards associated with the practice of allowing employees to ride the ripper and the step while the grader was moving," said David DiTommaso, OSHA area director in Billings.

OSHA investigators found that employees commonly walk beside the grader to uncover "blue tops" or grade markers, buried by gravel displaced during the grading process. Those employees must then get to the beginning of the next strip, sometimes a distance of several hundred yards, to repeat the process.

"Riding on the road grader at any position, other than the operator's station, is illegal and dangerous," added DiTommaso. "This tragic accident and the unsafe conditions discovered during the inspection could have been avoided by adherence to recognized safe work practices and OSHA regulations."

Willful violations are those committed with an intentional disregard of, or plain indifference to, the requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act. A serious violation is one where there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result, and the employer knew or should have known of the hazard.

Gilman is contesting the citations and proposed penalties before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

10 Facts About the State of Workplace Safety in the U.S.

July 12, 2024
Workplace safety in the U.S. has improved over the past 50 years, but progress has recently stalled. This report from the AFL-CIO highlights key challenges.

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!