Steelworkers Sue Oregon Steel for Excessive Air Pollution

April 11, 2001
A district court judge has given the green light to the United Steelworkers of America to sue Oregon Steel and CF&I Steel for failing to comply with federal Clean Air Act standards and limitations.

'

Judge Richard Matsch of the U.S. District Court in Denver, Colo., has given the green light to the United Steelworkers of America''s (USWA) lawsuit against Oregon Steel and CF&I Steel (now doing business as Rocky Mountain Steel Mills) over the companies failure to comply with federal Clean Air Act standards and limitations.

The union filed the lawsuit in April of last year, and the company sought last month to have the citizen suit dismissed, claiming that CF&I''s settlement with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment preempted all the violations alleged by USWA.

Judge Matsch rejected the company''s request for dismissal earlier this week, and ordered the lawsuit to go forward.

USWA''s citizen suit was amended to add a new allegation, that the company violated the Clean Air Act by failing to obtain a permit under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program and install the best available control technology (BACT) at the company''s steel mill in Pueblo, Colo., before making physical and operational changes to the mill from 1992 to 1998 that have resulted in an increase in air emissions.

The amended complaint also alleges that the company failed to comply with New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) related to construction of the company''s second electric arc furnace that was constructed after October 1974.

The union reported that EPA determined in December of 1999 that the company''s electric arc furnace No. 2 is subject to the more restrictive NSPA pollution standards, and directed the state to require the CF&I mill to comply with the NSPS standards under its operating permit.

USWA reported that the company currently faces multiple actions in two states for excessive environmental pollution.

Under the Clean Air Act any person can bring a lawsuit in federal district court against a person who is alleged to have violated an emission standard, limitation or order issued by an administrator or a state with respect to these standards or limitations, and requires a 60-day notice of intent to sue for certain violations.

Section 113 of the Clean Air Act provides for civil penalties of up to $27,500 per day for each violation of emissions standards or limitations.

In addition, a compliance order issued by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment provides a stipulated penalty of $15,000 per day for violation of the state''s 205 opacity standard for air emissions and deadlines set forth within the order.

"CF&I has been blowing smoke long enough. The company has disobeyed the law for years, and now is being held accountable," said John Perquin, USWA assistant to the International secretary-treasurer. "The union, along with the state of Colorado and EPA, is seeking to have the company obey the laws that protect our health and our environment."

by Virginia Sutcliffe

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

Navigating ESG Risk in Your Supply Chain

Sept. 26, 2024
Discover the role of ESG in supply chains, from reducing carbon footprints to complying with new regulations and enhancing long-term business value.

Best Practices for Managing Subcontractor Risk

Sept. 26, 2024
Discover how to effectively manage subcontractor risk with unified strategies, enhanced oversight, and clear communication for consistent safety and compliance.

Fitting in Fast: Making a Safe Workplace for New Hires

Sept. 12, 2024
Over a third of nonfatal injuries happen to workers who have been with their current employer for less than a year.

Top 10 Causes of Distracted Driving—and What They All Have in Common

Aug. 27, 2024
The results reveal the top ten causes of distracted driving, and make it clear that not all distractions are created equal.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!