Cell phones and Accidents: A Bad Connection?

Feb. 7, 2002
A recent tragedy renews the call for a ban on cell phone use while driving, but a Canadian safety organization thinks such a ban is ill-advised.

A recent tragedy has renewed the call for a ban on cell phone use while driving, but a Canadian safety organization thinks such a ban is ill-advised.

The Feb. 1 car crash occurred just outside of Washington, D.C., on Interstate 495 in Largo, Md., and killed five people. Law enforcement agencies say that cell phone use either caused or contributed greatly to the crash.

Dawn Richardson, 20, was driving her Ford Explorer - which she had just purchased that day - on the Capital Beltway when she lost control of the vehicle while talking to her boyfriend on her cell phone. She had been following him to his parent''s house in Prince George''s County, Maryland, and lost him in traffic. Her vehicle crossed a 55-foot median, jumped a guardrail into oncoming traffic, and landed on a minivan carrying four tourists from Quebec.

The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating the accident. The agency was already debating considering cell phone use as a potential distraction for drivers following a fatal crash last month in Illinois in which a driver talking on a phone drove into the path of an oncoming truck and was killed. NTSB investigator Dave Rayburn says that the agency is also looking into whether the guardrail design on the Capital Beltway contributed to the accident.

Although the Maryland accident received widespread attention in Canada, the Canada Safety Council says that there is little evidence that cell phones are making roads unsafe.

The group concedes that the inappropriate use of cell phones by drivers is part of a serious traffic safety problem, adding that distractions can be dangerous behind the wheel.

"Some say the solution is to ban drivers from using cell phones. The Canada Safety Council disagrees," declares a statement from the council.

Careless driving laws are already in place to prosecute drivers who do not make the driving task their top priority, the group notes. For example, Ontario drivers caught talking on cell phones, eating, reading or applying makeup are subject to a $325 fine and six demerit points. Similar penalties apply in other provinces in Canada and in many cities throughout the United States.

In fact, Maryland state legislator John S. Arnick (D-Baltimore County) has sponsored a bill that would fine drivers up to $500 for talking on hand-held cell phones while they drive. So far, he has not been able to get the legislation out of committee.

He''s trying again, saying many of his colleagues admit they''ve changed their minds about it in the wake of the accident.

"It''s a tremendously dangerous situation that could cause great, great harm," Arnick said.

New York is the only state to band hand-held cell phone use by drivers, but more than 40 other states are considering similar legislation.

Opponents of a ban, such as the Canada Safety Council, point out that use of cell phones has skyrocketed in recent years with no corresponding increase in collisions. The number of wireless subscribers in Canada, for example, has more than quintupled, from 1.8 million at end of 1994 to over 10 million today, while road fatalities dropped by 10 percent.

The Canada Safety Council is calling for more public awareness and education, and strict enforcement of the existing laws, rather than an out-and-out ban of cell phones.

"Regulation could negate the safety benefits of having a phone in the car. When you''re stuck in traffic, calling to say you''ll be late can reduce stress and make you less inclined to drive aggressively to make up lost time," the council points out.

"Our society has to a great extent condoned multi-tasking while driving," it continues in the statement. "Most vehicles have cup holders. Many also have complex radios and sound systems. Omnipresent drive-throughs encourage drivers to pick up food and beverages. Drivers eat, discipline their kids, use cell phones and even shave or apply make-up on the road."

In a study released last summer, five years of U.S. crash data (1995-1999) were analyzed by the University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center. That study estimated that about 13 percent of all collisions involved driver distraction. Only 1.5 per cent of these distraction-related collisions involved cell phones. Other distractions were far more common, including the car radio or CD player (11.4 per cent), and other passengers (10.9 per cent).

"A cell phone ban would be counterproductive, irresponsible and unenforceable. There are far more effective measures to save lives and enhance traffic safety," says the Canada Safety Council.

by Sandy Smith ([email protected])

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!