Automotive Service Association Asks OSHA to Consider the 'Economic Burdens' of Proposed Hex Chrome Standard on Collision Repairers

Jan. 20, 2005
With public hearings on OSHA's proposed hexavalent chromium standard less than two weeks away, stakeholders are weighing in on the subject.

The Bedford, Texas-based Automotive Service Association (ASA), in its comments submitted to OSHA, says the agency needs to consider the potential financial impact of a new hexavalent chromium standard on its collision members.

"ASA asks the agency to re-evaluate the potential economic burdens for collision repairers if this proposed regulation were to move forward in its current form," the trade organization said in its comments to OSHA. "What is not entirely clear in the economic impact analysis of the proposal is whether the agency considered the cost of new equipment, the cost of physical alterations/additions, the cost of additional technical training and the cost of additional staff hours to comply with the proposed regulations, i.e. recordkeeping and medical monitoring."

The ASA's collision members use refinishing products in the repair of vehicles. Sanding of some vehicle parts, grinding and limited welding could also present opportunities for the proposed new exposure standard to be triggered.

"Collision repairers have taken a leadership role in establishing a voluntary national training organization, the Inter-Industry Conference on Auto Collision Repair (I-CAR), to assure that technical staffers have the most up-to-date repair and safety information available," the ASA said in its comments to OSHA. "ASA is the founder of the Automotive Management Institute (AMI), which encourages best management practices and workplace safety.

"ASA encourages the agency to fully evaluate the economic burdens placed on automotive repairers by this proposed regulation."

OSHA is proposing to lower its permissible exposure limit for hexavalent chromium (Cr[VI]) and for all Cr(VI) compounds in construction, shipyards and general industry from 52 to 1 microgram of Cr(VI) per cubic meter of air (1 µg/m3) as an 8-hour time weighted average. The proposed rule also includes provisions for employee protection such as preferred methods for controlling exposure; respiratory protection; protective work clothing and equipment; hygiene areas and practices; medical surveillance; hazard communication; and recordkeeping.

Cr(VI) compounds are widely used in the chemical industry in pigments, metal plating and chemical synthesis as ingredients and catalysts. Cr(VI) also can be produced when welding on stainless steel or Cr(VI)-painted surfaces. The major health effects associated with exposure to Cr(VI) include lung cancer; asthma; nasal septum ulcerations and perforations; skin ulcerations (or chrome holes); and allergic and irritant contact dermatitis, according to OSHA.

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!