Sick Nuke Worker Plan Negotiations Continue

Sept. 28, 2000
For the last couple of weeks, Congress has been going back and\r\nforth over provisions of a plan that would compensate nuclear weapons\r\nplant workers made ill during the Cold War.

For the last couple of weeks, Congress has been going back and forth over provisions of a plan that would compensate nuclear weapons plant workers made ill during the Cold War.

Talks between the Senate and House broke down earlier this week, but House leaders said Tuesday they would resume negotiations with the Senate on a compensation plan.

The Department of Energy (DOE) recently reversed 50 years of federal policy by declaring that workers injured or killed by weapons-plant exposure be compensated.

Just how much money those workers should be compensated with is still at issue.

DOE had proposed minimum lump sum payments of $100,000.

When the Senate passed its version of the Defense Authorization Act, it included a provision awarding $200,000 plus health benefits to sickened workers.

DOE does not know how many of the 600,000 people who worked at weapons plants since World War II might have contracted beryllium diseases, silicosis or radiation-linked cancer, but officials there estimate that 4,000 workers would be eligible under the Senate-passed program.

The Congressional Budget Office estimated the measure would cost $7.1 billion over 10 years, based on DOE''s estimate that at least 4,000 workers are ill or have died.

Wary of an entitlement program with uncertain costs, the House passed only a resolution recommending compensation.

Eager to get the proposal passed, senators backed off from the $200,000 offer and told the House they could accept $100,000 as the minimum payment.

But that compromise still may not get funds to ill workers any faster. House negotiators offered a $250 million down payment on a compensation program that would need to be set up in future legislation following an additional study.

DOE said most workers likely to qualify for compensation would be those from the Hanford nuclear reservation in Washington state; Oak Ridge Reservation in Tennessee; Savannah River Site in South Carolina; Nevada Test Site; Rocky Flats Complex in Colorado; Pantex Plant in Texas; Mound Plant and Fernald Environmental Management Project in Ohio; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California; Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico; and gaseous diffusion plants in Piketon, Ohio; Paducah, Ky.; and Oak Ridge, Tenn.

by Virginia Sutcliffe

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

Unleashing the Power of Stories: Level-up Safety Culture with Three Easy Storytelling Tools

Jan. 3, 2025
Effective storytelling can shape a workplace culture and improve safety, especially in times of change when risk soars, hazards multiply and human factors threaten to derail progress...

4 Resources to Get Better Safety Performances From Supervisors

Jan. 3, 2025
Here is an overview of four of the best safety resources that safety folks can use as they consider how to get better safety performances from supervisors and workplace leaders...

4 Often Overlooked Types of New Workers—and the Different Dangers They Face

Jan. 3, 2025
This blog post is an adapted excerpt from the safety guide Fitting in Fast: Making a Safe Workplace for New Hires, which examines data and best practices regarding the protection...

4 Ways Frontline Supervisors Influence Workplace Safety

Jan. 3, 2025
These four areas determine whether frontline supervisors are having a positive or negative effect on workplace safety.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!