Hatch's Asbestos Bill Has Critics, Fans

May 28, 2003
One day last week Democrats and Republicans unveiled two bills that address two of the lingering effects of asbestos in America.

On May 22 Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., along with six cosponsors, none of whom are Republican, reintroduced legislation requiring EPA to ban asbestos within two years. The same day, Sen. Orrin Hatch, despite opposition from organized labor, pushed ahead with a bill that would establish a $108 billion trust fund to compensate victims of asbestos exposure.

Hatch's bill has two Democratic and four Republican cosponsors as well as the support of the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), leader of the Asbestos Alliance, a coalition that includes more than 200 companies, insurers, trade associations and other groups. It would require insurance companies and companies that have been sued to contribute about $45 billion each to the trust fund.

"We think it's a great step forward," commented Jan Amundson, NAM's general counsel. "We know this bill will go through changes before it gets to the Senate floor, and that there are important issues still to be resolved, but Sen. Hatch has provided a critical legislative starting point."

Unresolved issues cited by Amundson included two of the biggest problems the AFL-CIO has with the proposal: concerns over medical criteria used to determine eligibility for benefits, and worries that $108 billion won't be enough money to compensate victims adequately.

"The Hatch bill is merely a vehicle to relieve businesses and insurers of hundreds of billions of dollars of liability while significantly short-changing the asbestos victims of the fair compensation they are due," commented John Sweeney, president of the AFL-CIO, in a statement. The union estimates the Hatch bill's trust fund needs an additional $200 billion to meet future claims.

Sweeney strongly supported Murray's bill banning asbestos. Calling it "long overdue," he asserted that 600,000 workers have filed asbestos claims, and 1.2 million are expected to file future claims.

In remarks by Murray as she introduced her legislation, she said, "like most Americans I thought asbestos had already been banned. I was shocked to learn that asbestos is still being used in products on purpose."

OSHA estimates that 1.3 million workers in construction and general industry face significant asbestos exposure on the job.

While more than 30 other nations have banned asbestos, in 2001, the U.S. consumed 13,000 metric tons of the carcinogenic substance, which is still used in products like gaskets, roofing supplies and brakes.

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!