CSB Restructures Accident Data Program

Dec. 27, 2000
The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board plans to refocus and improve its chemical accident data program.

The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) plans to refocus and improve its chemical accident data program, in keeping with the Board''s recent five-year strategic plan.

"Better accident data will be helpful in targeting future prevention efforts," according to Board officials.

Board members voted unanimously to withdraw the agency''s 1999 preliminary accident data study, The 600K Report: Commercial Chemical Incidents in the United States 1987-1996.

The "600K" of the title referred to a calculated total of 600,000 chemical incidents reported to the federal government between 1987 and 1996.

The then-chairman of the CSB submitted The 600K Report as part of written testimony to a House of Representatives panel in February 1999.

However, the report had never been voted on by the full board, whose members must approve all CSB reports.

An internal staff review found serious flaws in the composite database that was developed by CSB staff and formed the basis of The 600K Report.

For example, the database contained casualty data for transportation accidents where the presence of hazardous materials was only coincidental.

At the same time, information on known serious chemical accidents, like a series of fatal refinery blasts in the late 1980s and early 1990s, was absent from the report or incomplete, according to the staff review.

"The 600K Report was an ambitious attempt to get a complete snapshot of chemical accidents nationwide," said Irv Rosenthal, CSB board member. "Unfortunately the five existing federal accident databases that formed the basis of the report were not designed with this purpose in mind. These federal databases were created to serve specific statutory purposes, such as the initiation of emergency response activities. The failure of the ''600K'' data integration project only underscores the importance of a concerted effort to get high-quality accident data."

The composite database was assembled in 1999 by compiling 10-year records from five government sources. Preliminary screening was done in an effort to eliminate non-chemical events and duplicate records.

"One conclusion of The 600K Report -- that chemical accidents occur too often and cause unnecessary deaths, injuries and disruption -- is surely true," noted Rosenthal. "Without a better yardstick, however, it will prove difficult to direct resources to the areas of greatest need or measure progress in accident prevention. To improve safety systems we need comprehensive, industry- and chemical-specific accident statistics."

Laying out the Board''s future direction, Rosenthal said, "Over the coming months, we will be working closely with stakeholders and tapping our best expertise internally to arrive at meaningful accident data goals. Other federal agencies also have an important role to play, and we look forward to cooperating with them. We need to develop readily accessible, high-quality accident data without placing unnecessary or duplicative reporting requirements on industry. Ideally, data quality can improve while reporting mechanisms actually get simpler."

In the interim, CSB will include a new accident data directory page on the Board''s Web site, www.chemsafety.gov.

In 2001, CSB will convene a stakeholder roundtable to discuss proposals for improving chemical accident data.

by Virginia Sutcliffe

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

Unleashing the Power of Stories: Level-up Safety Culture with Three Easy Storytelling Tools

Jan. 3, 2025
Effective storytelling can shape a workplace culture and improve safety, especially in times of change when risk soars, hazards multiply and human factors threaten to derail progress...

4 Resources to Get Better Safety Performances From Supervisors

Jan. 3, 2025
Here is an overview of four of the best safety resources that safety folks can use as they consider how to get better safety performances from supervisors and workplace leaders...

4 Often Overlooked Types of New Workers—and the Different Dangers They Face

Jan. 3, 2025
This blog post is an adapted excerpt from the safety guide Fitting in Fast: Making a Safe Workplace for New Hires, which examines data and best practices regarding the protection...

4 Ways Frontline Supervisors Influence Workplace Safety

Jan. 3, 2025
These four areas determine whether frontline supervisors are having a positive or negative effect on workplace safety.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!