EPA Will Not Regulate Coal Waste as Toxic, Hazardous

April 27, 2001
EPA's decision to not classify the ash and sludge from coal burning plants as toxic hazardous waste has prompted concern from environmentalists who argue the waste is contaminating water supplies.

EPA announced yesterday that it plans to develop national standards to address wastes from coal burning plants that are presently either land disposed or used as fill in mining. However, the agency will not classify the ash and sludge as toxic hazardous waste.

It was a decision that prompted praise from the utilities and dissension from environmental groups that have argued the waste is contaminating public water supplies.

Combustion waste is currently exempted from federal regulation, but these wastes contain toxic metals that, when improperly disposed, may pose a threat to public health and the environment.

EPA acted after a federal court declined to grant an extension request so that the agency could utilize upcoming scientific analysis in making a more complete determination about the waste.

In March, EPA proposed that coal ash be treated as a hazardous substance because of evidence that the waste might be more hazardous than previously thought.

The draft proposal ran into stiff opposition from the Department of Energy and other agencies, prompting EPA Administrator Carol Browner to try to seek a delay, despite a court order that had set a deadline of yesterday for action.

U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan late yesterday refused to give EPA any more time, prompting the agency to issue its decision a few hours later.

Although EPA is concerned because combined wastes generated from utilities can have serious effects on human health, it does not believe that regulation of the materials as hazardous waste is justified.

For now, EPA''s federal standards will urge states to require liners at disposal sites and regular monitoring of water sources near such sites, agency officials said. But under this approach, EPA could not require state action.

"After careful review of the present disposal of these wastes, we believe these additional measures are needed to ensure that public health and the environment are protected," said EPA Acting Deputy Administrator Michael McCabe. "If the states and industry do not take steps to address these wastes adequately or if EPA identifies additional risk to public health, the agency will revisit this decision to determine whether a hazardous waste approach is needed."

The agency''s decision has yielded disappointment from many environmental and public health groups.

Environmentalists have complained that more than 100 million tons of coal waste, laced with arsenic, mercury and other toxic metals, is contaminating water supplies because of lax controls by many states and no regulation from Washington.

"This decision -- to leave the citizens at the mercy of flawed state laws -- is based on politics, not science," said Jeff Stant of Hoosier Environmental Coalition, an Indianapolis-based group that has conducted is own independent examination of toxic pollution from power plant waste. "We have provided EPA with scientific proof of more than 60 instances of ecological damage and health risks caused by dumping of unregulated coal combustion waste. And we fear that is just the tip of the iceberg."

States at the center of the controversy, including Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Texas, could have a fallout in the presidential race.

The four states are among the leaders in power plant waste and environmentalists have singled out Texas for poor enforcement of coal waste disposal. For example, some states, like Texas, don''t even require a permit if the waste is disposed of within 50 miles of the power plant.

Environmentalists contend the agency''s action follows on the heels of a political pressure campaign directed at the Senate and the House to carry the polluting industries'' message to the White House.

"Good science has been abused by bad politics," said Carolyn Johnson of the Citizens Coal Council, a national federation of 53 grassroots groups working for clean water and a healthy environment in coal mining communities. "The electric utilities -- the nation''s biggest polluters -- have poured millions of dollars into campaign contributions, and it seems to have paid off, at least for now. This decision by the administration gives the polluters a green light to dump their poisons wherever they want."

The electric utility industry maintains the coal ash -- often dumped with no more safeguards than normal trash -- poses no threat because of the low concentration of toxic metals.

It also says there is no clear evidence it is responsible for contaminating waterways or underground aquifers.

by Virginia Sutcliffe

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

March 13, 2025
Learn about the main differences between OHSAS 18001 and ISO 45001, and how ISO 45001 takes a proactive approach to prevent work-related incidents. Find out why businesses should...
March 13, 2025
Avetta is a leader in contractor management, and with over 15 years of industry experience, we can help you establish a robust contractor pre-qualification program that aligns...
March 13, 2025
EQT commits to supporting Avetta in its ongoing growth and innovation journey.
March 13, 2025
Learn OSHA workplace lighting requirements to enhance safety, productivity, and quality. Discover standards, compliance benefits, and risks of non-compliance.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!