Ergo Symposium Is Biased, Says Industry Group

Jan. 15, 2004
A symposium organized by OSHA's National Advisory Committee on Ergonomics (NACE) that will be held later this month is "entirely inconsistent" with the announced goal of objectively reviewing data-driven ergonomics research, according to the National Coalition on Ergonomics (NCE), an industry association that has opposed many government-led efforts to address ergonomics.

In an odd twist, the research symposium has now been attacked both by prominent ergonomics researchers - worried it would rehash scientific questions they believe have been resolved - and by NCE, because the symposium will not be exploring precisely these sorts of questions.

In a Jan. 13 letter to NACE chair Carter Kerk, NCE complains that "rather than inviting a balanced panel of serious scientists," Kerk states he was asked by OSHA Administrator John Henshaw to look for research which "fits into a business case for ergonomics." NCE argues that the NACE charter calls for an unbiased examination of the science underlying ergonomics and believes the symposium must address "gaps in research in the search for sound science." Instead, the Jan. 27 meeting "looks only for a certain type of 'science' and seeks to establish how it makes sense to business."

NCE believes the symposium ought to address what it calls "the disputed theory that physical risk factors are a primary cause of musculoskeletal disorders," but complains that nearly all the panelists are instead advocates of the business case for ergonomics.

In a letter to Kerk last month, a group of eleven prominent ergonomics researchers refused to participate in the symposium because they worried the symposium would focus on "research topics already exhaustively reviewed."

Kerk later explained in an interview (See http://www.occupationalhazards.com/full_story.php?WID=11190"Ergonomic Experts Shun NACE Ergo Symposium") that he shared the concern of these researchers that the symposium would debate whether these types of injuries exist or whether workplace ergonomic programs are effective. "But that's not what we're trying to do at all," he said.

In its letter to Kerk, NCE calls on NACE to reach out to medical researchers identified by the industry group and demands the symposium be delayed and reoriented toward "sound science." If NACE fails to heed this advice, NCE promised it would not attend the symposium and "would actively discourage others from doing so."

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!