EHS Today
  • Magazine Subscription
  • ENewsletters
  • EHS Education
  • Safety Leadership Conference
  • America's Safest Companies
    • Search
  • EHS Today Intelligence
  • Safety
  • Health
  • Environment
  • Standards
  • Safety Technology
  • Training & Engagement
  • Leadership
  • Topics
    EHS IntelligenceEnvironmentHealthSafetyLeadershipStandardsConstructionPPESafety TechnologyTraining & EngagementEmergency ManagementCOVID-19 CrisisIndustrial Hygiene
    Resources
    Member BenefitsSafety Leadership ConferenceEHS EducationAmerica's Safest Companies AwardsWebinarsWhite PapersWorkplace Safety AcademyMagazine SubscriptioneNewsletter SubscriptionLatest HeadlinesContact UsAdvertisePress ReleasesPrivacy & Cookie PolicyTerms of Service
    https://www.facebook.com/pages/EHS-Today/66542218626?ref=ts
    https://www.linkedin.com/groups/4355311
    https://twitter.com/EHSToday
    1. Archive

    House Subcommittee Divided Along Party Lines on Ergo Plan

    April 26, 2002
    The partisan divisions provoked by OSHA's latest ergonomics plan were on full display yesterday at a House Workforce Protections Subcommittee hearing attended by Occupational Hazards.
    EHS Today Staff

    The partisan divisions provoked by OSHA''s latest ergonomics plan were on full display yesterday at a House Workforce Protections Subcommittee hearing. Mirroring almost precisely what happened at a Senate ergonomics hearing last week, House Republicans generally defended - while Democrats attacked - OSHA''s new program to address repetitive motion injuries.

    Although he said he was worried OSHA''s enforcement against ergonomic hazards could go too far, in his opening statement subcommittee chair Rep. Charles Norwood, R-Ga., pleaded for members of Congress, unions, employers and employees to unite around OSHA''s plan in order to solve ergonomic problems.

    "We can look at this as a plan that can work if, together, we make it work," said Norwood. "Or, we can look at this as someone else''s plan and hinder its implementation with cries that we need to start over and play by new rules that a majority has already rejected once."

    It appeared that Democrats on the subcommittee have chosen the second option.

    OSHA Administrator John Henshaw, the only witness at the hearing, explained his "four-pronged comprehensive" ergonomics program, an approach that calls for voluntary guidelines, additional research, expanded outreach, and enforcement under OSHA''s General Duty clause.

    He failed to persuade Democrats that his approach was new, that General Duty Clause enforcement would work, or that voluntary guidelines would be sufficient to cut ergonomic hazards in many workplaces.

    "Your program is not mutually incompatible with development of a standard," argued Rep. Major Owens of New York, the ranking Democrat on the subcommittee. Other Democrats on the subcommittee also called on OSHA to develop a new ergonomics standard, as they maintained that too many employers would simply ignore voluntary guidelines.

    Henshaw countered that Congress had already rejected OSHA''s previous ergonomics rule and that a new one could take more than four years to do a new one. Workers need protections now, he argued, and the agency could complete guidelines sooner than a new standard.

    "Our goal now should not be to rush out another rule for the sake of issuing a rule," said Henshaw. "At some point, the rubber needs to meet the road; and, as Secretary [of Labor] Chao has said, the time is now."

    In an indication of the re-emerging political salience of ergonomics, the powerful chairman of the House Committee on Education and Workforce, Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, made a brief appearance at the hearing.

    Like his Republican colleagues, Boehner expressed general support for OSHA''s ergonomics plan, though, again like his fellow Republicans, he expressed mild concern the agency may be going too far in its efforts to fight repetitive motion injuries.

    Boehner referred to the National Academy of Sciences report on musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) released in January of 2001 that stated no MSDs are uniquely caused by work and that a "generic solution" to ergonomic hazards was "neither feasible nor desirable."

    The Ohio Republican maintained that what torpedoed OSHA''s ergonomics standard last year was the view that it was a "generic" solution, and he asked Henshaw how his approach avoided this pitfall.

    The OSHA administrator replied that the agency''s guidelines would be developed where the science is clear, and that further research will pursue what is not known.

    by Jim Nash

    Continue Reading

    NSC Awards Innovators Aiming to Solve Most Common Workplace Injury

    CNH Industrial-Saskatoon's Tech-Focused Safety in the Spotlight of NSC's Latest Research

    Sponsored Recommendations

    Is Your Safety Program Effective? 10 Questions Every Safety Leader Should Ask

    Nov. 7, 2023

    Purposeful Presence: How Leaders Show Up to Amp Up Performance

    Nov. 7, 2023

    The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease

    Nov. 7, 2023

    Autopsy of an Injury Uncovering 18 Million Exposures in One Activity

    Nov. 7, 2023

    Voice your opinion!

    To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!

    I already have an account

    New

    Suicide Rates Hit Highest Level Ever in 2022

    OSHA Forms Alliance to Better Protect Crane Operators

    OSHA Violations, Citations and Inspections: What You’re Reading in November 2023

    Most Read

    So You Think You Know a Lot about OSHA? (Quiz)

    Ergonomic Risk Assessment: Quick Exposure Check

    OSHA’s First Aid Requirements: FAQs – Answered!


    Sponsored

    Planes, Trains, and Kitchen Tables: 5 Ways Technology Enables Ergonomics in Any Environment

    5 Tactics to Build Stronger Employee Engagement for a Safer Workplace

    Back to Basics: How to Simplify Your Safety Program to Achieve Real Results

    EHS Today
    https://www.facebook.com/pages/EHS-Today/66542218626?ref=ts
    https://www.linkedin.com/groups/4355311
    https://twitter.com/EHSToday
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Do Not Sell or Share
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    © 2023 Endeavor Business Media, LLC. All rights reserved.
    Endeavor Business Media Logo