House Subcommittee Divided Along Party Lines on Ergo Plan

April 26, 2002
The partisan divisions provoked by OSHA's latest ergonomics plan were on full display yesterday at a House Workforce Protections Subcommittee hearing attended by Occupational Hazards.

The partisan divisions provoked by OSHA''s latest ergonomics plan were on full display yesterday at a House Workforce Protections Subcommittee hearing. Mirroring almost precisely what happened at a Senate ergonomics hearing last week, House Republicans generally defended - while Democrats attacked - OSHA''s new program to address repetitive motion injuries.

Although he said he was worried OSHA''s enforcement against ergonomic hazards could go too far, in his opening statement subcommittee chair Rep. Charles Norwood, R-Ga., pleaded for members of Congress, unions, employers and employees to unite around OSHA''s plan in order to solve ergonomic problems.

"We can look at this as a plan that can work if, together, we make it work," said Norwood. "Or, we can look at this as someone else''s plan and hinder its implementation with cries that we need to start over and play by new rules that a majority has already rejected once."

It appeared that Democrats on the subcommittee have chosen the second option.

OSHA Administrator John Henshaw, the only witness at the hearing, explained his "four-pronged comprehensive" ergonomics program, an approach that calls for voluntary guidelines, additional research, expanded outreach, and enforcement under OSHA''s General Duty clause.

He failed to persuade Democrats that his approach was new, that General Duty Clause enforcement would work, or that voluntary guidelines would be sufficient to cut ergonomic hazards in many workplaces.

"Your program is not mutually incompatible with development of a standard," argued Rep. Major Owens of New York, the ranking Democrat on the subcommittee. Other Democrats on the subcommittee also called on OSHA to develop a new ergonomics standard, as they maintained that too many employers would simply ignore voluntary guidelines.

Henshaw countered that Congress had already rejected OSHA''s previous ergonomics rule and that a new one could take more than four years to do a new one. Workers need protections now, he argued, and the agency could complete guidelines sooner than a new standard.

"Our goal now should not be to rush out another rule for the sake of issuing a rule," said Henshaw. "At some point, the rubber needs to meet the road; and, as Secretary [of Labor] Chao has said, the time is now."

In an indication of the re-emerging political salience of ergonomics, the powerful chairman of the House Committee on Education and Workforce, Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, made a brief appearance at the hearing.

Like his Republican colleagues, Boehner expressed general support for OSHA''s ergonomics plan, though, again like his fellow Republicans, he expressed mild concern the agency may be going too far in its efforts to fight repetitive motion injuries.

Boehner referred to the National Academy of Sciences report on musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) released in January of 2001 that stated no MSDs are uniquely caused by work and that a "generic solution" to ergonomic hazards was "neither feasible nor desirable."

The Ohio Republican maintained that what torpedoed OSHA''s ergonomics standard last year was the view that it was a "generic" solution, and he asked Henshaw how his approach avoided this pitfall.

The OSHA administrator replied that the agency''s guidelines would be developed where the science is clear, and that further research will pursue what is not known.

by Jim Nash

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

March 13, 2025
Learn about the main differences between OHSAS 18001 and ISO 45001, and how ISO 45001 takes a proactive approach to prevent work-related incidents. Find out why businesses should...
March 13, 2025
Avetta is a leader in contractor management, and with over 15 years of industry experience, we can help you establish a robust contractor pre-qualification program that aligns...
March 13, 2025
EQT commits to supporting Avetta in its ongoing growth and innovation journey.
March 13, 2025
Learn OSHA workplace lighting requirements to enhance safety, productivity, and quality. Discover standards, compliance benefits, and risks of non-compliance.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!