Government Proposal Would Restrict Public Access to ChemicalRelease Info

April 28, 2000
EPA recently proposed regulations governing public access to information concerning the potential off-site consequences of releases from chemical facilities.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) recently proposed regulations governing public access to information concerning the potential off-site consequences of accidental chemical releases from industrial facilities.

Off-site Consequence Analysis (OCA) information, which includes "worst-case scenarios," is information collected under section 112 ( r) (7) of the Clean Air Act as part of regulated facilities'' Risk Management Plants.

The 1999 Chemical Safety, Information, Site Security and Fuels Regulatory Relief Act required the government to assess both the chemical risk reduction benefits of allowing public access to OCA information and the increased risk of terrorists and other criminal activity from posting the information on the Internet.

The proposed rule attempts to address both of these concerns.

Under this proposal, all of the OCA information would be available to the public through several means, but it would prohibit the Internet posting of those OCA data elements that could result in a significant risk of increased terrorist or criminal activity.

Opponents of the proposed rule, like the Working Group on Community Right-To-Know, said the rule severely restricts the public''s right-to-know if toxic spills and fires at chemical plants can harm people in surrounding communities.

Paul Orum, director of the Working Group on Community Right-to-Know said the Administration has failed to even begin a Congressionally-mandated site security study of chemical plants that could be used to make sure that industries take real steps to prevent such spills.

"The Administration''s policy of secrecy plus inaction makes no sense," said Orum. "This is a know-nothing, do-nothing response to dangerous practices in the chemical industry."

"By restricting information without improving site-security and safety, the Administration makes it hard for citizens to hold their government and industry accountable, leaving communities vulnerable to dangerous industry practices," commented Orum.

Chemical fires and spills kill some 250 Americans each year. Orum pointed out that for this reason, Congress included in the Clean Air Act of 1990 a prevention program.

In this program, the public won the right-to-know what could happen in a "worst case" chemical accident at an industrial facility.

"The successful 1986 Right to Know Act disclosed many manufacturers'' toxic pollution on the Internet," said Orum. "Public disclosure is intended to save lives, prevent pollution and protect property. The public deserves to know if their safety is in danger."

The proposed rule is expected to be published in this week''s Federal Register.

Comments on the proposal must be received by June 8. There will be a public hearing May 9, in Washington, D.C.

For further information on the proposed rule, see www.epa.gov/ceppo.

by Virginia Sutcliffe

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

Committing to Safety: Why Leadership’s Role in Safety Excellence is Key

Jan. 13, 2025
Leadership has the power to transform an organization through their behavior and vision, which can result in the creation of an organizational culturethat supports safety excellence...

Speak Up! Cementing "See Something, Say Something" to Drive Safety

Jan. 13, 2025
Many organizations promote "see something, say something" to encourage their people to intervene and make work safe. But most don't go far enough to equip teams with the skills...

The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease

Jan. 13, 2025
DEKRA announces its latest white paper, “The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease,” as a definitive look into why being vulnerable to incidents strengthens our commitment...

Mitigating Risks: Strategies for Safeguarding Workers in Hazardous Workplaces

Jan. 13, 2025
Join our expert team in taking on the challenge to make safety part of your organization’s DNA as work, the workforce, and workplaces evolve.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!