Henshaw Speaks Out About OSHRC Decision

Dec. 9, 2003
OSHA Administrator John Henshaw is speaking out about the agency's appeal of a ruling that could block its ability to issue egregious citations against the worst violators of workplace safety rules.

OSHA has appealed a decision by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) that held that Eric K. Ho, a Houston contractor who failed to provide protective equipment or training to 11 workers exposed to asbestos, committed only a single violation of OSHA personal protective equipment and training requirements. OSHRC ruled that the Secretary of Labor unfairly applied per-employee citations against Ho.

OSHA has asked the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to reverse the OSHRC decision. "In accord with agency policy, the [OSHA] citations charged that Ho violated OSHA's training and protective equipment standards 11 times each, once for each worker he failed to protect," Henshaw explained.

Ho challenged the citations before the commission, and an administrative law judge (ALJ) upheld them. This fall, however, on review of the ALJ's decision, the full commission held that Ho was only liable for a single violation of each of those standards, regardless of how many workers he failed to protect. It reduced the proposed penalties for these violations by more than 80 percent, from $858,000 to $140,000.

"OSHA believes strongly that the commission decision is wrong," said Henshaw. "OSHA issued 'instance-by-instance' citations in this case because of Ho's egregious conduct. Ho took absolutely no action to protect his workers, and failed even to tell them of their exposure to asbestos." Henshaw pointed out that when the state of Texas ordered Ho to stop work because he was also violating its requirements, Ho's only response was to perform the work at night, with the building locked, so he would not be discovered. "The effort to avoid detection failed when a gas explosion seriously injured three workers. The explosion was caused by Ho's order to open a valve, even though he did not know what the valve controlled," Henshaw added.

The case began on Sept. 3, 1998, when OSHA charged Ho with 28 willful violations of the Occupational Safety and Health Act and its asbestos standards, and proposed civil penalties totaling nearly $1.5 million dollars. Ho's violations included assigning workers to remove fireproofing at a building in Houston, Texas, without telling them that the fireproofing contained asbestos, without training them to remove it safely, and without providing them with protective clothing and respirators.

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!