Michigan Workplace Safety Law Reform Vetoed by Governor

June 9, 2004
An attempt by Michigan lawmakers to require Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration (MIOSHA) inspectors to show that a employers knowingly and willfully violated the state's worker safety law before issuing a "willful" violation got the boot from Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm on June 5.

In a letter to the Michigan Senate, Granholm noted, "I do not support this effort to hinder the effective and efficient administration of Michigan's workplace safety laws."

Under S.B. 647, for an inspector to issue a "willful" violation, the inspector must determine:

  • The employer had knowledge that the condition was hazardous and did not abate the hazard.
  • The employer was aware of the standard established by the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Act (MIOSH Act).
  • The employer knew that the condition at issue violated a standard established by the MIOSH Act.
  • Whether the employer had taken steps to comply with the standard established by the MIOSH Act.
  • How the nature and extent of the violation constituted plain indifference of the employer to the health and safety of the employees.
  • How the employer intentionally and deliberately disregarded his or her responsibilities under a specific provision of the MIOSH Act or a rule or standard adopted under the MIOSH Act.

Granholm also disapproved of measures in the legislation that "provide for and clarify procedure for obtaining interview statements during an inspection." These measures would discourage employees from telling MIOSHA about safety violations and would limit the ability of inspectors to obtain statements with employees, said Granholm.

S.B. 671 would require inspectors to tell employees and employers, during an interview or partial interview conducted as part of an inspection, investigation or violation proceeding, that the interviewee has the following rights:

  • The right to decline an interview.
  • The right to have the interview conducted in private.
  • The right to have present a representative of the interviewee. In such a case, the interview shall be conducted on a date and in a location mutually agreed upon by all of the parties to the interview.

Members of the state senate who say the legislation is necessary to make Michigan more of a business-friendly state - are not ruling out the possibility of attempting to override Granholm's veto or of proposing new, similar legislation.

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!