Federal, State Workers Support Ergonomic Rule

Nov. 29, 2000
Labor unions representing state and federal workers applauded the\r\npublication of OSHA's final ergonomic standard saying it is an\r\nimportant victory for workers.

Labor unions representing state and federal workers applauded the publication of OSHA''s final ergonomic standard saying it is an important victory for workers.

"This is a truly historic victory for worker safety," said Gerald McEntee, president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). AFSCME represents 1.3 million public service and health care sector workers.

"But the final battle for an ergonomic standard is not yet over," warned McEntee. "There are a number of factors, including the outcome of the Presidential election, that could affect the future of this standard and the health and safety of millions of workers."

The fight over ergonomics will also continue in courts and in Congress.

The Chamber of Commerce and other business interests have recently filed lawsuits to stop the OSHA standard.

"Legislators and business leaders must be interested in more than the bottom line," said McEntee. "A successful business in not just measured by the dollars it brings in, but by the health and safety of its employees."

In issuing the regulations, OSHA projected that over the first 10 years of implementation, more than 3 million workdays lost to ergonomic injuries would be prevented in general industry.

Colleen M. Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) said echoed McEntee''s thoughts saying that there can be no higher priority in the workplace than the health and safety of those who work there.

NTEU represents more than 155,000 employees in agencies and departments.

"OSHA has said that employers with ergonomics programs report a direct link in improved product quality, while leading to better employee health and safety and reduced turnover and absenteeism, along with lower productivity costs," said Kelley. "It is clear that these standards make good sense, economically and otherwise."

Business groups opposed to the rule have argued that it is not based on sound scientific proof.

Noting that the cost and impact of ergonomics injuries, affecting the hands, back and other portions of the musculoskeletal system, haven been documented and studied over at least the past 20 years, Kelley said, "it is well past time for us to take this important stop forward in protecting the health of America''s working men and women, including federal employees."

Bobby L. Harnage, national president of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), which represents more than 600,000 federal and Washington, D.C. government workers said, "the long overdue standard is a big step toward major improvement in federal workplaces."

The biggest problem with the standard, she said, is that OSHA cannot fine federal government employers other than the Postal Service for safety violations.

However, Harnage remains optimistic that, with the standard in place, AFGE can put pressure on the government to correct ergonomics violations.

"AFGE worked very hard on this standard for its members," said Harnage. "We will work to see that the new OSHA standard is implemented within the federal workplace."

by Virginia Sutcliffe

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

What is the key difference between OSHAS 18001 vs. ISO 45001

March 13, 2025
Learn about the main differences between OHSAS 18001 and ISO 45001, and how ISO 45001 takes a proactive approach to prevent work-related incidents. Find out why businesses should...

Ensuring a Safer Workplace through a Comprehensive Contractor Qualification Framework

March 13, 2025
Avetta is a leader in contractor management, and with over 15 years of industry experience, we can help you establish a robust contractor pre-qualification program that aligns...

EQT Private Equity to Acquire Avetta from WCAS

March 13, 2025
EQT commits to supporting Avetta in its ongoing growth and innovation journey.

Guide to OSHA Workplace Lighting Requirements

March 13, 2025
Learn OSHA workplace lighting requirements to enhance safety, productivity, and quality. Discover standards, compliance benefits, and risks of non-compliance.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!