Nuclear Facilities' Safety Rules Provoke Bi-partisan Criticism

Feb. 13, 2004
The Bush administration is contradicting the will of Congress with an "unprecedented" proposal that would allow Department of Energy (DOE) contractors at nuclear facilities to violate OSHA standards, according to a recent letter written by Sens. Jim Bunning, R-Ky., and Edward Kennedy, D-Mass.

"Absolutely not true," counters Beverly Cook, DOE's assistant secretary for environment, safety and health, when asked if the department's proposal violates the will of Congress. "It is not our opinion that we are contradicting the intent of the law. We are implementing it."

The DOE proposal would replace government safety standards at nuclear facilities with individual safety and health programs written by the contractors who operate the various facilities. DOE would then inspect and enforce these safety plans, but it would not have authority to enforce OSHA standards and other safety rules not included in the contractor's submitted plan.

Cook says OSHA standards are not always appropriate or protective enough. The new proposal allows DOE to enforce safety standards appropriate to each worksite and workers will be better protected than they are presently because the department can fine violators.

While OSHA general industry and construction safety standards apply to the DOE sites, the department currently lacks authority to enforce the rules. To remedy this problem, Bunning and Kennedy sponsored legislation directing DOE to promulgate health and safety standards for DOE facilities operated by contractors, and granted the department authority to assess fines against violators.

The law also granted DOE flexibility to take account of hazards peculiar to individual worksite. In their Feb. 6 letter to DOE Secretary Spencer Abraham, the senators argue DOE "has expanded the concept of flexibility to such a great extent that it undermines the purpose of the statute." The senators have asked DOE to withdraw and revise the proposal to reflect the law's intent.

"DOE's agenda is very disturbing and simply at odds with the uniform minimum safety standards which apply under OSHA to every DOE contractor that is simultaneously operating in the private sector," said Richard Miller, senior policy analyst at the Government Accountability Project. "What makes these contractors so special when they come to DOE?"

The American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) believes that with changes, the proposed rule has the potential to improve the health and safety of DOE workers. Among the changes to the proposed rule suggested by AIHA are the addition of an explicit statement that conformance to applicable OSHA standards and case law interpretations should be a minimum requirement.

Cook said DOE is currently reviewing public comments to its proposal. A final rule will be issued will be issued "several months down the road," she said.

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!