GE Suit Charges Superfund Provisions Invalid

Nov. 30, 2000
The General Electric Co. has filed suit seeking to have provisions of the\r\nSuperfund law declared invalid for failing to provide\r\nconstitutional due process.

The General Electric Co. (GE) yesterday filed suit in Federal District Court in Washington, D.C., seeking to have provisions of the federal Superfund law declared invalid for failing to provide constitutional due process.

The provisions give EPA uncontrolled authority to order intrusive remedial projects of unlimited scope and duration in non-emergency situations.

The provisions fail to provide for constitutionally adequate hearings or opportunity for judicial review, according to GE.

The company said that EPA''s authority to issue such unilateral orders violates due process in two basic ways:

  • Superfund fails to provide any kind of neutral hearing prior to EPA''s order. EPA alone selects the evidence it will use and the scope of required actions, without any court review, said GE.
  • Superfund fails to provide timely and meaningful judicial review even after a unilateral EPA order. If a party believes such an order is unlawful and refuses to comply with it, then the party immediately faces severe fines and treble damages. Yet, EPA, not the party, unconstitutionally controls the timing and content of any subsequent independent court review, and review delayed is review denied, according to the company.

Professor Laurence Tribe of Harvard University Law School, who represents GE in the case, said, "This is an Alice-in-Wonderland regime of punishment first, trial afterwards -- even in a non-emergency setting. The statute gives EPA the power to skew the evidence, ignore other points of view and order action without any independent review. Then the party has to do the work and wait years for a hearing. Even then, the long-delayed hearing is inadequate because it is not impartial. This offends the Constitution."

"Because it deprives parties like GE of liberty and property but fails to provide an impartial and timely hearing -- an basic protection guaranteed to all persons by the Constitution -- the Superfund provision is flatly unconstitutional on its face," continued Tribe.

The suit maintains that these unilateral orders from EPA and totally out of line with the hearing and judicial review protections afforded by other administrative agencies in non-emergency situations.

by Virginia Sutcliffe

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

Committing to Safety: Why Leadership’s Role in Safety Excellence is Key

Jan. 13, 2025
Leadership has the power to transform an organization through their behavior and vision, which can result in the creation of an organizational culturethat supports safety excellence...

Speak Up! Cementing "See Something, Say Something" to Drive Safety

Jan. 13, 2025
Many organizations promote "see something, say something" to encourage their people to intervene and make work safe. But most don't go far enough to equip teams with the skills...

The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease

Jan. 13, 2025
DEKRA announces its latest white paper, “The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease,” as a definitive look into why being vulnerable to incidents strengthens our commitment...

Mitigating Risks: Strategies for Safeguarding Workers in Hazardous Workplaces

Jan. 13, 2025
Join our expert team in taking on the challenge to make safety part of your organization’s DNA as work, the workforce, and workplaces evolve.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!