New OSHA Recordkeeping Rules Hold Top Executives Accountable

April 2, 2003
It might be time for executives to go back to school to learn about OSHA's revised recordkeeping standard, since they might be held accountable for any mistakes or falsifications in injury and illness logs.

As of Feb. 1, employers must designate someone at the company to certify the annual summary of work-related injuries and illnesses. In the past, OSHA required certification only by the person who actually kept the injury log throughout the year, such as the occupational safety and health professional or a human resources manager. The new law is very specific about the definition of a company executive. Executives, for the purpose of the recordkeeping standard, can be: an owner of the company (only if the company is a sole proprietorship or partnership); an officer of the company; the highest ranking official working at the establishment; or the immediate supervisor of the highest ranking official working at the establishment.

Paul S. Maco, an attorney with Houston-based law firm Vinson & Elkins, notes much has been written about the provisions in the new Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which makes executives more accountable for the accuracy of their firm's SEC disclosures. He points out that "what has received less attention, but could be even more important to many executives, is OSHA's new recordkeeping accountability provisions." Maco, writing in an article for the Mondaq Business Briefing (wwwmondaq.com), says with the new recordkeeping provisions, an executive must certify in writing that he or she has examined the injury summary and that it is "true, accurate and complete."

"An executive's failure to properly certify the summary can result in fines for the company and may increase the penalties for any errors that OSHA discovers. A false certification could also make an executive personally liable for the falsity," says Maco.

This new law will call for executives, who likely have no prior safety experience or expertise, to educate themselves about the new criteria for determining what constitutes a recordable injury or illness. The regulations state that the executive must "reasonably believe" the summary is accurate based on his or her knowledge of the process by which the injury information was recorded, says Maco. He adds OSHA suggested in commentary that at a minimum, the executive must be familiar with the OSHA recordkeeping requirements, the company's recordkeeping practices and the company's injury log.

"Despite this limited guidance, there are still many unanswered questions," acknowledges Maco. "For example, how much knowledge must an executive have to be 'familiar' with the intricate recordability criteria? Must an executive evaluate whether particular injuries should have been recorded?"

Until these and other questions regarding the certification requirement are answered, he says, covered employers should err on the side of caution. "At a minimum," Maco counsels, "covered employers should assure that their chosen executives receive education and training sufficient to understand OSHA's new recordkeeping criteria and to apply that knowledge to the company injury log."

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!