Ergonomics: Industry Groups Challenge OSHA's RulemakingProcess

Aug. 24, 2000
Two industry groups opposed to OSHA's ergonomics standard are\r\naccusing the agency of a "stealth maneuver" because it inserted 2,000\r\npages of evidence in the ergonomics record.

Two industry groups opposed to OSHA''s ergonomics standard are accusing the agency of a "stealth maneuver" because it inserted 2,000 pages of "eleventh hour" evidence in the ergonomics record that would change the way the rule''s cost is estimated.

The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and the National Coalition on Ergonomics (NCE) renewed their calls for OSHA to allow additional time for stakeholders to review and comment on the data.

Estimates of how much the ergonomics rule would cost American business vary widely, and are a hotly debated part of the controversial proposal.

A survey of NAM members conducted earlier this year pegged the cost of complying with the ergonomics regulation in its first year at $6.7 billion. OSHA estimates the rule would cost business $4.2 billion, and generate $9 billion in savings each year.

An OSHA spokesperson denied that the additional information submitted by the agency changed cost estimates. The agency delivered the data a few days before the post-hearing comment period on the proposal closed Aug. 10.

"It is routine to place additional, supplementary information in the docket while the public record is open," said the spokesperson. The new data is nothing more than backup information, such as product supply catalogues, the spokesperson added.

But an attorney for the NCE was reported to have said OSHA has experienced a "sea change" in its approach to the cost analysis of the rule.

Industry groups argued that because the new data was submitted after the close of the public comment period in June, they have not been able to evaluate or respond to the documents.

"If OSHA has seen the light and decided that its preliminary economic analysis was flawed and in need of revamping, we welcome that development," said NAM Vice President for Human Resources Pat Cleary. "OSHA cannot legally restrict its economic analysis on evidence that it has shielded from public scrutiny by submitting it after the public comment period has closed," he concluded.

Despite industry demands that the comment period be extended this year, this latest skirmish in the ergonomics war may have more to do with what happens next year.

OSHA is unlikely to extend the comment period, because the agency is committed to issuing a final rule this year.

Industry complaints about the legality OSHA''s rulemaking process are probably intended to bolster business''s legal challenges to the ergonomics standard, a battle that is widely expected to begin next year.

by James Nash

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

Ensuring a Safer Workplace through a Comprehensive Contractor Qualification Framework

March 13, 2025
Avetta is a leader in contractor management, and with over 15 years of industry experience, we can help you establish a robust contractor pre-qualification program that aligns...

EQT Private Equity to Acquire Avetta from WCAS

March 13, 2025
EQT commits to supporting Avetta in its ongoing growth and innovation journey.

Guide to OSHA Workplace Lighting Requirements

March 13, 2025
Learn OSHA workplace lighting requirements to enhance safety, productivity, and quality. Discover standards, compliance benefits, and risks of non-compliance.

What is the difference between Tier 1, 2, and 3 suppliers and why do they matter?

March 13, 2025
From raw materials to final products, each supplier tier poses risks and liabilities that can impact your organization. Avetta's supply chain management software offers peace ...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!