EHS Today
  • Magazine Subscription
  • ENewsletters
  • EHS Education
  • Safety Leadership Conference
  • America's Safest Companies
    • Search
  • EHS Today Intelligence
  • Safety
  • Health
  • Environment
  • Standards
  • Safety Technology
  • Training & Engagement
  • Leadership
  • Topics
    EHS IntelligenceEnvironmentHealthSafetyLeadershipStandardsConstructionPPESafety TechnologyTraining & EngagementEmergency ManagementCOVID-19 CrisisIndustrial Hygiene
    Resources
    Member BenefitsSafety Leadership ConferenceEHS EducationAmerica's Safest Companies AwardsWebinarsWhite PapersWorkplace Safety AcademyMagazine SubscriptioneNewsletter SubscriptionLatest HeadlinesContact UsAdvertisePress ReleasesPrivacy & Cookie PolicyTerms of Service
    https://www.facebook.com/pages/EHS-Today/66542218626?ref=ts
    https://www.linkedin.com/groups/4355311
    https://twitter.com/EHSToday
    1. Archive

    Can Improved Job Safety Save the Government Money?

    April 9, 2004
    In a recent memo, President George W. Bush directed all executive branch departments and agencies to participate in a new program called Safety, Health and Return-to-Employment (SHARE). In FY 2003 the federal government paid out more than $2 billion in workers' compensation costs, and Bush wants those costs reduced.
    James Nash

    The new initiative proclaims ambitious goals that may be difficult to meet. Tom Marple is OSHA's director of the office of federal agency programs and is responsible for implementing SHARE among executive branch workers.

    In a recent interview, Marple said one difference between previous efforts to improve safety for federal workers and SHARE is that the new initiative, which covers three fiscal years (2004-2006) gives federal agencies specific goals:

    • Reduce total cases by at least 3 percent per year;
    • Reduce lost time case rates by at least 3 percent per year;
    • Increase timely filing of workers compensation claims by 5 percent per year;
    • Reduce lost production days by at least 1 percent per year.

    The government estimates savings of $250 million per year if the goals are met. But will the government hit these targets?

    In 2002, the Department of Labor held a summit on federal workers' safety, announcing a new commitment to reduce the human and financial costs of those hurt at work. But for the first time in a decade the total case rate (4.19) and the lost-time case rate (1.93) actually increased in FY 2003.

    Marple explained that the increase last year was because of the unique circumstances surrounding the start-up of the Transportation Security Agency (TSA). "It's difficult to go from zero to 65,000 employees in one year," he said. "Hiring that many people in a short time period raises many safety and health challenges."

    Marple, who said he was not intimately involved in the 2002 summit, pointed to the primary new feature of SHARE that may make it successful: department and agency heads will be held accountable for achieving the case reduction goals.

    "We believe setting goals and holding agencies accountable will stimulate increased requests for assistance from OSHA," said Marple. "It may also stimulate increased participation in training and more funding for agencies' safety and health programs."

    At least one summit goal, requiring the federal government to report injuries and illnesses the same way the private sector does, is nearing completion. "We have a draft regulation on this that is currently under review by the Office of Management and Budget," said Marple. Currently, federal injury and illness reporting is tied to the filing of workers' compensation claims.

    But will the focus on meeting goals for reducing injury and illnesses lead to "short cuts and compromises to achieve paper instead of real gains?" That's the concern of James Kendrick, president of the American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE). In a written statement, Kendrick commended the SHARE initiative, but warned the administration not to rely on "trailing indicators," such as lower case rates. He called on the administration to use "leading indicators," and suggested using the comprehensive safety and health program that OSHA withdrew from its regulatory agenda in 2002.

    Marple replied that 29 CFR part 1960 already requires the federal agencies to have a safety and health management program.

    "The regulation has been in place for a number of years," Marple explained, "but some agencies don't follow it as well as others."

    Continue Reading

    Health Benefit Costs to Increase 5.2% in 2024

    Why Aren’t We Marketing EHS as the Valuable Career It Is?

    Sponsored Recommendations

    Is Your Safety Program Effective? 10 Questions Every Safety Leader Should Ask

    Nov. 7, 2023

    Purposeful Presence: How Leaders Show Up to Amp Up Performance

    Nov. 7, 2023

    The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease

    Nov. 7, 2023

    Autopsy of an Injury Uncovering 18 Million Exposures in One Activity

    Nov. 7, 2023

    Voice your opinion!

    To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!

    I already have an account

    New

    OSHA Forms Alliance to Better Protect Crane Operators

    OSHA Violations, Citations and Inspections: What You’re Reading in November 2023

    EHS Technology: It’s All in the Data

    Most Read

    So You Think You Know a Lot about OSHA? (Quiz)

    Health Benefit Costs to Increase 5.2% in 2024

    Ohio Train Derailment: What Went Wrong?


    Sponsored

    Safety maturity curve - A journey from lagging indicators to leading indicators

    Occupational Hygiene and Respiratory Illness: Clearing the Air

    10 EHS Dashboards that drive your decisions for a healthy and safe workplace

    EHS Today
    https://www.facebook.com/pages/EHS-Today/66542218626?ref=ts
    https://www.linkedin.com/groups/4355311
    https://twitter.com/EHSToday
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Do Not Sell or Share
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    © 2023 Endeavor Business Media, LLC. All rights reserved.
    Endeavor Business Media Logo