DeCoster Egg Farms in Trouble with OSHA Again

June 19, 2002
Don't count your chickens before they're hatched. Or, in this case, don't count on a new name for an old company having too great an impact on the safety program.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) cited the four companies that took over the DeCoster Egg Farm's business in Turner, Maine, for safety and health violations. The companies are facing penalties totaling $344,810.

A total of 27 alleged violations of OSHA's safety and health standards were delivered to Maine AG, Maine Contract Farming, PFS Loading Services Inc. and Turner Maintenance & Services Inc. Maine Contract Farming was also cited for four alleged willful violations.

"I am committed to protecting workers and promoting safe workplaces. Companies need to make safety their number one priority," said Secretary of Labor Elaine L. Chao. "While these companies have made some strides in addressing previously cited hazards, it's important that they continue to work to protect their workers."

OSHA initiated inspections last December at the four facilities to determine compliance with previously cited hazards. As a result of those follow-up inspections, OSHA issued citations against the firms for unguarded equipment, defective eye wash stations, hazardous electrical equipment, uninspected fire extinguishers, exposed asbestos, unsafe roof structures, unsanitary shower facilities, fall hazards and unmarked floor jacks.

Four alleged willful violations were issued to Maine Contract Farming for exposing workers to the dangers of collapsing buildings. The egg farm, which contains multiple-barn complexes designed to house its chickens, has an extensive history of roof collapses caused by improperly installed roof trusses - the most recent collapse occurred in January 1999. The alleged willful violations carry a total penalty of $280,000.

The remainder of the citations issued included: five alleged serious violations with proposed penalties of $5,410; 12 alleged repeat violations carrying $59,400 in proposed penalties; and six other-than-serious violations with no assessed penalties.

"We're going to continue to work with these firms to ensure that their employees are protected," said OSHA Administrator John Henshaw. "But we will not hesitate to wield a strong enforcement arm when employers refuse to fix identified hazards while continually placing their workers in danger."

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

Ensuring a Safer Workplace through a Comprehensive Contractor Qualification Framework

March 13, 2025
Avetta is a leader in contractor management, and with over 15 years of industry experience, we can help you establish a robust contractor pre-qualification program that aligns...

EQT Private Equity to Acquire Avetta from WCAS

March 13, 2025
EQT commits to supporting Avetta in its ongoing growth and innovation journey.

What is the difference between Tier 1, 2, and 3 suppliers and why do they matter?

March 13, 2025
From raw materials to final products, each supplier tier poses risks and liabilities that can impact your organization. Avetta's supply chain management software offers peace ...

3 Surprising Ways Contractors & Suppliers in APAC Impact Your Bottom Line

March 13, 2025
What would happen if your suppliers were sued, went bankrupt, or became entangled in criminal activity?

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!