© Peter Kováč | Dreamstime
Texas Facemask 6047b13844661

States Rejecting COVID Rules Create Employer Problems

March 9, 2021
Federal mask and other mandates continue to remain in force.

The states of Texas, Wyoming and Mississippi have chosen to discard their legal and regulatory restraints on businesses that were instituted to control the spread of COVID-19, but employers need to keep in mind that federal legal requirements remain in force and need to communicate this fact to their employees.

There is no better example of this than the mask mandates, which these states have on their books but which they have chosen to eliminate.

In Texas, Gov. Greg Abbott (R) issued an Executive Order on March 2 removing the state’s mask mandate and permitting all businesses to operate at 100% capacity as of March 10. In Mississippi, Gov. Tate Reeves (R) announced his state’s lifting of all state-imposed mask mandates and ended COVID-19 related restrictions on business operations.

On March 8, Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon (R) announced that his state would lift its mask requirements along with other COVID-19 economic restrictions. In addition, South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster (R) remarked on his state’s lack of a mask mandate throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that his state couldn’t remove one because it “never had one in the first place.”

Attorneys Daniel R. Stern and Elizabeth Voss of the Dykema Gossett law firm say the Texas governor’s order may serve to encourage employees who were opposed to company safety protocols to resist them.

“As was the case before the executive order, and recognizing the possible need for religious or disability accommodation, employees who refuse to comply with any policy or requirement, including a requirement to wear a mask in common areas of the worksite, can be disciplined up to and including termination of employment,” they point out.

The order also does not require businesses to operate at 100% capacity, does not prohibit businesses from requiring or encouraging mask-wearing by employees and customers, and does not prohibit businesses from implementing additional safety protocols to reduce the risk of transmission of COVID-19.

When it comes to the Texas governor’s action, “nothing in this executive order precludes businesses or other establishments from requiring employees or customers to follow additional hygiene measures, including the wearing of a face covering,” Stern and Voss state.

Business Restrictions Remain

Brittany Barrientos and Molly Walsh, attorneys with the law firm of Stinson LLP, tell businesses they should not be too quick to change their workplace policies because the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) still requires employers to provide a safe and healthful work environment.

Under a direct order signed by President Joe Biden on his first day in office, the federal agency has issued extensive new guidelines for employers who come under its jurisdiction. Employers should provide all workers with face coverings (that is, cloth face coverings or surgical masks), unless their work task requires a respirator.

In its guidance, OSHA says face coverings supplied by employers should have at least two layers and should not feature exhalation valves or vents. In operations where face coverings can become wet or soiled, employers should provide workers with replacements daily or more frequently.

The agency is expected to publish an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS)—which also was ordered by the president and has been long sought by labor unions—no later than mid-March to protect workers from COVID-19. That ETS will have the force and effect of a federal regulation and is widely expected to include face covering requirements and other items included in the 6,000-word guidance that OSHA issued on Jan. 29.

Workplace guidances that have been issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) during the pandemic also told employers they should adopt masking requirements for their workers, and some employers’ failure to do so has led to lawsuits filed by employees who have contracted the disease.

Stern and Voss also note that the Texas governor’s order does not shield businesses from liability if employees or customers contract COVID-19 on site. In fact, it encourages individuals and businesses to continue to follow health recommendations from the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) and to wear face coverings where social distancing is not feasible.

The executive order expressly states that “individuals are strongly encouraged to wear face coverings over the nose and mouth wherever it is not feasible to maintain six feet of social distancing from any other person not in the same household.”

Stern and Voss stress, “While these measures are encouraged and not required, the executive order cannot reasonably be read to justify the elimination of any and all precautions an employer might have taken as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.”

Barrientos and Walsh recommend, “To avoid potential liability under OSHA and to avoid the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace, face covering policies should remain in place regardless of employee vaccine status and regardless of the presence (or absence) of state/local orders requiring face coverings.” They add that where other state and local health agencies have similar recommendations or requirements, those also should be considered.

About the Author

David Sparkman

David Sparkman is founding editor of ACWI Advance (www.acwi.org), the newsletter of the American Chain of Warehouses Inc. He also heads David Sparkman Consulting, a Washington D.C. area public relations and communications firm. Prior to these he was director of industry relations for the International Warehouse Logistics Association. Sparkman has also been a freelance writer, specializing in logistics and freight transportation. He has served as vice president of communications for the American Moving and Storage Association, director of communications for the National Private Truck Council, and for two decades with American Trucking Associations on its weekly newspaper, Transport Topics.

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!