DuPont, Lucite Agree to Pay $2 Million for Clean Air Violations

April 23, 2009
DuPont and Lucite International Inc. have agreed to pay a $2 million civil penalty to settle Clean Air Act violations at a sulfuric acid plant in Belle, W.Va., EPA, the U.S. Justice Department and the state of West Virginia announced.

The sulfuric acid plant, owned by Lucite and operated by DuPont, is located on a 100-acre chemical manufacturing complex along the Kanawha River. The companies will pay $1 million to the United States and $1 million to the state of West Virginia. In addition, the companies chose to shut down the sulfuric-acid manufacturing unit of a larger chemical facility at the site; the settlement confirms this agreement. Under the settlement, the unit is scheduled to shut down by April 1, 2010.

"The actions taken as part of this settlement will reduce emissions of air pollutants by more than 1,000 tons each year," said Catherine McCabe, acting assistant administrator for the EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. "Sulfur dioxide emissions can be harmful to children, the elderly and people with heart and lung conditions."

In a joint complaint, filed concurrently with the consent decree, the United States and West Virginia allege that the companies made modifications to their plant in 1996 without first obtaining pre-construction permits and installing required pollution control equipment. The Clean Air Act requires major sources of air pollution to obtain such permits before making changes that would result in a significant emissions increase of any pollutant.

DuPont: Changes Did Not Increase Emissions

According to DuPont spokesperson Nate Pepper, the SAR unit at Belle began operating prior to the Clean Air Act New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and New Source Review (NSR) programs. EPA alleges that modifications to the SAR unit triggered the NSPS and NSR requirements.

"DuPont and Lucite conducted routine maintenance, repair and replacement projects at the SAR unit for safety, efficiency and reliability, but none of the projects resulted in an increase in emissions," Pepper said in a statement sent to EHS Today. "Therefore, DuPont disagrees with EPA's interpretations of the NSPS and NSR requirements, which have been the subject of widespread litigation and varied interpretation."

Pepper pointed out that "DuPont has chosen to work cooperatively with EPA to resolve the disagreement." He also added that Lucite announced its intent to cease operations of the SAR unit. DuPont does not anticipate any job losses as a result of this announced shutdown.

Sulfur Dioxide

"This settlement is part of the U.S. government's dedicated effort to bring all sulfuric acid manufacturers into compliance with the Clean Air Act," said John C. Cruden, acting assistant attorney general in charge of the Justice Department's Environmental and Natural Resources Division.

According to EPA, the Belle sulfuric acid plant burns sulfuric acid sludge, which creates sulfur dioxide (SO2). Most of the SO2 is converted to sulfuric acid and recovered, but a portion of the chemical is emitted to the atmosphere. In addition to SO2, the plant also emits sulfuric acid mist, nitrogen dioxide and carbon monoxide.

SO2 can have serious health effects on children, the elderly, and people with heart and lung conditions. It also contributes to the formation of acid rain, which can affect ponds, lakes and streams. Acid rain has resulted in the acidification of waters in ponds, lakes, and streams, leading to the disappearance of animal and plant life. Acid rain is also believed to leach nutrients from sensitive soils and damage forests.

Sulfuric acid is widely used for ore processing, fertilizer manufacturing, oil refining, wastewater processing and chemical synthesis.

Related Articles

Coal-Fired Power Plant to Spend $135 Million to Settle Clean Air Violations
Big Issues Keep Industrial Hygienists Focused on the Big Picture
BP Agrees to Pay Nearly $180 Million to Settle Clean Air Violations

About the Author

Laura Walter

Laura Walter was formerly senior editor of EHS Today. She is a subject matter expert in EHS compliance and government issues and has covered a variety of topics relating to occupational safety and health. Her writing has earned awards from the American Society of Business Publication Editors (ASBPE), the Trade Association Business Publications International (TABPI) and APEX Awards for Publication Excellence. Her debut novel, Body of Stars (Dutton) was published in 2021.

Sponsored Recommendations

Navigating ESG Risk in Your Supply Chain

Sept. 26, 2024
Discover the role of ESG in supply chains, from reducing carbon footprints to complying with new regulations and enhancing long-term business value.

Best Practices for Managing Subcontractor Risk

Sept. 26, 2024
Discover how to effectively manage subcontractor risk with unified strategies, enhanced oversight, and clear communication for consistent safety and compliance.

Fitting in Fast: Making a Safe Workplace for New Hires

Sept. 12, 2024
Over a third of nonfatal injuries happen to workers who have been with their current employer for less than a year.

Top 10 Causes of Distracted Driving—and What They All Have in Common

Aug. 27, 2024
The results reveal the top ten causes of distracted driving, and make it clear that not all distractions are created equal.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!