Image

EPA Upholds Penalty for Hazardous Waste Violations

Feb. 20, 2015
     

The U.S. EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board (EAB) upheld the results of a hazardous waste storage EPA enforcement action initiated in 2011.

EPA’s original complaint cited violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) – the federal law governing the treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste – by Chem-Solv Inc., the operator of a chemical distribution facility in Roanoke, Va., and Austin Holdings-VA L.L.C., the facility owner.

Chem-Solv and Austin Holdings-VA handle and distribute various chemicals, including alcohols, acids, caustics, mineral oils, surfactants, glycols and solvents.

“EPA takes seriously our obligation to protect people’s health and safeguard communities by assuring compliance with the nation’s environmental laws,” said EPA Regional Administrator Shawn M. Garvin. “This final decision and order affirms the due diligence we took in pursuing an enforcement action to address hazardous waste violations that put the public’s health and environment at risk.”

The EAB in a Jan. 26 Final Decision and Order upheld the 2014 Initial Decision made by a EPA Chief Administrative Law Judge, and ordered those cited to pay the full $612,338.78 civil penalty.

In a 2014 appeal, Chem-Solv questioned the ALJ’s determination that: the company had impermissibly operated a hazardous waste storage tank regulated under RCRA; a leaking chemical drum contained a solid waste rather than a useful product; the company had failed to make required hazardous waste determinations for materials in the storage tank and for certain aerosol paint cans; and whether the ALJ demonstrated bias against the Chem-Solv in the underlying decision.

However, the EAB said the ALJ’s Initial Decision was “supported by a preponderance of the evidence” and that allegations of bias were “without merit.”

The EAB ordered full payment of the penalty within 30 days and maintained that the company comply with applicable RCRA hazardous waste tank closure requirements. 

About the Author

Ginger Christ | Associate Editor

Ginger Christ is an associate editor for EHS Today, a Penton publication.

She has covered business news for the past seven years, working at daily and weekly newspapers and magazines in Ohio, including the Dayton Business Journal and Crain’s Cleveland Business.

Most recently, she covered transportation and leadership for IndustryWeek, a sister publication to EHS Today.

She holds a bachelor of arts in English and in Film Studies from the University of Pittsburgh.

Connect on Google+ | LinkedIn | Twitter

Sponsored Recommendations

June 23, 2025
With the right workplace health and safety training, your organization can reduce risk and protect your employees.
June 23, 2025
This article covers the key steps to build a reliable SDS management program, from organizing your inventory and sourcing updated SDS to ensuring easy access and regular maintenance...
June 23, 2025
It's time to get a bit more granular and start to examine the types of metrics EHS departments should be tracking, starting with lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR).
June 23, 2025
With the number of lone workers on the rise, here are five facts every employer should know about lone working.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!