CSB Sheds Light on Fatal Kleen Energy Explosion, Highlights Gas Blow Hazards

March 3, 2010
In a Feb. 25 statement, U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB) Lead Investigator Don Holmstrom said the fatal Feb. 7 explosion at the Kleen Energy Plant in Middletown, Conn., occurred during a planned gas blow. He expressed broader safety concerns over natural gas power plants venting gas near worksites, a practice he called “inherently unsafe.”

Holmstrom described a gas blow as a common industry practice that entails releasing gas at high velocity through open pipe ends to remove debris from the pipes. In the Kleen Energy Plant incident, the gas built up in a congested area and was ignited by an undetermined source. Six workers died in the explosion.

“Initial calculations by CSB investigators reveal that approximately 400,000 standard cubic feet of gas were released to the atmosphere near the building in the final 10 minutes before the blast,” Holmstrom said.

“That is enough natural gas to fill the entire volume of a pro-basketball arena with an explosive natural gas-air mixture, from the floor to the ceiling,” he added.

A team of 10 CSB investigators arrived at the Kleen Energy Plant on Feb. 8 to examine the accident site, conduct interviews and review documents. CSB’s investigation will focus on determining the regulations, codes and good practices that might apply to gas blows.

“In the meantime, we strongly caution natural gas power plants and other industries against the venting of high-pressure natural gas in or near worksites. This practice, although common, is inherently unsafe,” Holmstrom said.

Broader Concerns

“The safety issues raised by this accident are not limited to Connecticut,” Holmstrom said. “These issues are larger than any particular company, facility or individual. The U.S. has embarked an ambitious construction effort for new natural gas power plants. Thousands and thousands of workers across the country will be involved in constructing these plants. The safety of these workers and the nation’s energy independence are at stake as these gas-fired plants are built over the next 20 years.”

Holmstrom added that CSB is investigating possible alternatives to gas blowing, including the use of air, steam, nitrogen, water or combustion devices to safely destroy the gas.

“Companies must ensure that flammable gases are not vented into close proximity with ignition sources and workers. That is a vital safety message from all these tragedies,” Holmstrom said.

Sponsored Recommendations

ISO 45001: Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems (OHSMS)

March 28, 2024
ISO 45001 certification – reduce your organizational risk and promote occupational health and safety (OHS) by working with SGS to achieve certification or migrate to the new standard...

Want to Verify your GHG Emissions Inventory?

March 28, 2024
With the increased focus on climate change, measuring your organization’s carbon footprint is an important first action step. Our Green House Gas (GHG) verification services provide...

Download Free ESG White Paper

March 28, 2024
The Rise and Challenges of ESG – Your Journey to Enhanced Sustainability, Brand and Investor Potential

Free Webinar: Mining & ESG: The Sustainability Mandate

March 28, 2024
Participants in this webinar will understand the business drivers and challenges of ESG and sustainability performance, the 5 steps of the ESG and sustainability cycle, and prioritized...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!