Union Supports Government Proposal to Help Ailing Workers

April 17, 2000
The Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical & Energy Workers Union, spoke out in favor of the Clinton Administration's plan to provide compensation for ailing nuclear plant workers.

The Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical & Energy Workers Union (PACE), has spoke out in favor of the Clinton Administration's call last week to provide compensation for nuclear plant workers who were in danger during the Cold War.

PACE represents workers at 11 DOE nuclear weapons facilities and two beryllium facilities.

"The Administration has made an historic announcement today by admitting that the DOE and its contractors poisoned workers in the process of building nuclear weapons, and that the government has an obligation to assure these workers receive compensation if they are sick or dying," said PACE Executive Vice President Robert E. Wages.

PACE said it supports the Administrations scientific and policy basis for building a legislative remedy for the 600,000 workers who built nuclear weapons in an "ultra-hazardous" industry.

"DOE and its contractors have historically placed production ahead of safety, and because DOE has been self-regulated and operated behind a veil of secrecy, the evidence demonstrates that workers have been forced to pay a high price," said James K. Phillips, PACE vice president for governmental affairs.

Although the union is the government has agreed to take responsibility and compensate workers, it still has some problems with the proposal.

The Administration proposal shifts the burden of proof on to the government for radiation related diseases at Paducah, Portsmouth and Oak Ridge K-25.

However, workers at all other DOE nuclear weapons sites -- in states such as Washington, Idaho, New Mexico and Colorado -- the burden of proof would shift to the worker to prove radiation-related illness.

PACE believes "this must be corrected."

Also, DOE has said it will begin advocating on behalf of workers to establish eligibility for claims for illness caused by toxic chemicals, heavy metals or silicosis.

DOE proposes to use state workers' compensation programs to pay these claims, however, PACE is skeptical about this idea.

"This is naive, if not unworkable. DOE has not established its credibility and independence to advocate for workers when they are liable for paying out compensation," according to PACE.

Sponsored Recommendations

3 Essential Elements for a Strong Safety Culture

March 13, 2024
Organizations globally have increased their attention on safety culture: trying to figure out what it really is and the aspects that are necessary to develop and sustain it. And...

Making the Case for Occupational Health Software

March 13, 2024
Deciding to invest in Occupational Health (OH) software can be a challenging leap for many organizations. This article will equip businesses with insightful strategies for effectively...

Fighting the Flu: Solutions for the Workplace

March 13, 2024
Seasonal flu continues to wreak considerable havoc both on individual wellness, as well as on our business continuity and productivity. Explore these solutions for protecting ...

Preventing SIFs with Digitization: Reduce Serious Injuries and Fatalities with Technology

March 13, 2024
This eBook discusses the origins of SIF prevention, outlines principles, models and tools available to EHS leaders to better detect and address SIF potential in their business...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!