Labor Takes Another Blow From GOP-led Congress

March 7, 2001
AFL-CIO President John Sweeney is calling Congress' action to overturn OSHA's ergonomics standard, "dishonest" and "disgraceful."

"''Dishonest'' and ''disgraceful'' are not strong enough words to describe the Senate vote against injured workers in Congress," AFL-CIO President John Sweeney commented in regards to last night''s Senate vote to repeal OSHA''s ergonomics standard.

Union officials believe organized labor is paying the price for its support of Democrats and former Vice President Al Gore in the November elections in the wake of the Senate''s vote.

"It''s a shameful portrayal of what this Congress is all about when I thought we were entering into a new era of bipartisanship," said Bill Borwegen, occupational health and safety director for the Service Employees International Union.

AFL-CIO''s Sweeney noted that is the first health and safety standard nullified in OSHA''s 30-year history.

"Senators hostile to the interests of working families rushed a naked political pay-off to big business contributors who have opposed every effort to enact a standard protecting workers," said Sweeney. "They tried to claim that it''s just this rule they oppose; it''s just the process this time to which they object. That''s rubbish. The same businesses that are swarming Capital Hill this week have turned their backs on workers'' safety, workers'' pay and workers'' family needs at every juncture."

Sweeney also expressed concern that the attack on the rules aimed at protecting workers was done with the full backing of the Bush Administration.

"Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao must answer for ducking and equivocating instead of standing up for 10 years of rulemaking by the Department of Labor," said Sweeney. "Chao appears to have become a willing partner in the systematic attempt by President Bush, who raised $250 million from corporations in his election campaign, to depress workers and weaken unions in America in order to further tilt the balance in this country in favor of corporate power."

The new ergonomics regulations, which had been the subject of a decade-long political fight, were enacted in the final days of the Clinton Administration.

They required businesses to make adjustments to work stations and to pay for some health care and medical leave if they determine an employee suffers from repetitive stress injuries caused by work.

Businesses were given until October to comply.

by Virginia Sutcliffe

Sponsored Recommendations

3 Essential Elements for a Strong Safety Culture

March 13, 2024
Organizations globally have increased their attention on safety culture: trying to figure out what it really is and the aspects that are necessary to develop and sustain it. And...

Making the Case for Occupational Health Software

March 13, 2024
Deciding to invest in Occupational Health (OH) software can be a challenging leap for many organizations. This article will equip businesses with insightful strategies for effectively...

Fighting the Flu: Solutions for the Workplace

March 13, 2024
Seasonal flu continues to wreak considerable havoc both on individual wellness, as well as on our business continuity and productivity. Explore these solutions for protecting ...

Preventing SIFs with Digitization: Reduce Serious Injuries and Fatalities with Technology

March 13, 2024
This eBook discusses the origins of SIF prevention, outlines principles, models and tools available to EHS leaders to better detect and address SIF potential in their business...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!