Is Small Business Blocking Updated PELs?

Aug. 8, 2003
Little progress could be detected at a July meeting of those working to modernize permissible exposure limits (PELs), according to Peg Seminario, health and safety director of the AFL-CIO.

She confirmed reports by other stakeholders that small business representatives are throwing up the biggest obstacles to the effort.

"We are not holding things up, but we are interested in protecting small businesses," countered Andrew Langer, manager, regulatory policy at the National Federation of Independent Businesses (NFIB)

He said NFIB's last proposal was to update 30 PELs with a pilot project that would be an experimental process, rather than a permanent law.

"Some of our colleagues do not agree," Langer explained. "They want a permanent expedited rulemaking process, without an evaluation of how it affects small businesses."

Langer said his organization is open to other proposals, but because larger companies are already following stricter PELs, he believes the new rules are aimed at small businesses. Therefore, it is appropriate for small companies to be most concerned about changes to the status quo.

Last year, Rep. Charlie Norwood, R-Ga., chairman of the House Subcommittee on Workforce Protections, told chemical industry stakeholders that if they could reach agreement on how to proceed, he would introduce legislation to update PELs.

"At this point we've gotten pretty close," asserted Norwood in a recent interview. "But these groups don't trust each other, so it's hard for them to give."

Seminario and others at the meeting believe there is still interest in reaching agreement, and the stakeholders plan to convene at least once more in September. But Seminario spoke of this as the last chance for achieving consensus before reporting back to Norwood and the ranking Democrat on the subcommittee, Rep. Major Owens, D-NY on "where things ended up."

She also questioned Norwood's insistence on total consensus among stakeholders as the necessary condition for progress. "We do need some leadership here," she asserted. "Why should the small business people agree to something? Big business agrees, but as long as any one party has a veto right, I don't think it's going to happen."

Sponsored Recommendations

3 Essential Elements for a Strong Safety Culture

March 13, 2024
Organizations globally have increased their attention on safety culture: trying to figure out what it really is and the aspects that are necessary to develop and sustain it. And...

Making the Case for Occupational Health Software

March 13, 2024
Deciding to invest in Occupational Health (OH) software can be a challenging leap for many organizations. This article will equip businesses with insightful strategies for effectively...

Fighting the Flu: Solutions for the Workplace

March 13, 2024
Seasonal flu continues to wreak considerable havoc both on individual wellness, as well as on our business continuity and productivity. Explore these solutions for protecting ...

Preventing SIFs with Digitization: Reduce Serious Injuries and Fatalities with Technology

March 13, 2024
This eBook discusses the origins of SIF prevention, outlines principles, models and tools available to EHS leaders to better detect and address SIF potential in their business...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!