Michigan Workplace Safety Law Reform Vetoed by Governor

June 9, 2004
An attempt by Michigan lawmakers to require Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration (MIOSHA) inspectors to show that a employers knowingly and willfully violated the state's worker safety law before issuing a "willful" violation got the boot from Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm on June 5.

In a letter to the Michigan Senate, Granholm noted, "I do not support this effort to hinder the effective and efficient administration of Michigan's workplace safety laws."

Under S.B. 647, for an inspector to issue a "willful" violation, the inspector must determine:

  • The employer had knowledge that the condition was hazardous and did not abate the hazard.
  • The employer was aware of the standard established by the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Act (MIOSH Act).
  • The employer knew that the condition at issue violated a standard established by the MIOSH Act.
  • Whether the employer had taken steps to comply with the standard established by the MIOSH Act.
  • How the nature and extent of the violation constituted plain indifference of the employer to the health and safety of the employees.
  • How the employer intentionally and deliberately disregarded his or her responsibilities under a specific provision of the MIOSH Act or a rule or standard adopted under the MIOSH Act.

Granholm also disapproved of measures in the legislation that "provide for and clarify procedure for obtaining interview statements during an inspection." These measures would discourage employees from telling MIOSHA about safety violations and would limit the ability of inspectors to obtain statements with employees, said Granholm.

S.B. 671 would require inspectors to tell employees and employers, during an interview or partial interview conducted as part of an inspection, investigation or violation proceeding, that the interviewee has the following rights:

  • The right to decline an interview.
  • The right to have the interview conducted in private.
  • The right to have present a representative of the interviewee. In such a case, the interview shall be conducted on a date and in a location mutually agreed upon by all of the parties to the interview.

Members of the state senate who say the legislation is necessary to make Michigan more of a business-friendly state - are not ruling out the possibility of attempting to override Granholm's veto or of proposing new, similar legislation.

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

June 23, 2025
Learn about lone working laws in the US, key hazards and risks, and get actionable advice on how to keep your lone workers safe.
June 23, 2025
Chemical substitution can quickly get messy, with unclear steps and the risk of swapping one hazard for another. This checklist helps you avoid costly mistakes, prioritize which...
June 23, 2025
A mature approach to health and safety means making safety a core part of your culture, where everyone plays a role and performance is measured by more than just numbers. In this...
June 23, 2025
Behavior-based safety focuses on observing and encouraging safe behaviors to reduce workplace risks. Experts explain how strong safety culture, clear methods, and digital tools...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!