NASA
NASA-PPE-McClain

Proper Fit for PPE Not Just for Space Walks

April 11, 2019
The law requires that employers must ensure equipment fits all employees intended to wear it.

A high-profile snafu in space has brought new focus on personal protective equipment (PPE) and the obligation of employers to make sure that it fits all the members of an increasingly diverse workforce who are expected to wear it.

This was brought home most vividly in late March when NASA was forced to cancel the first-ever space walk by two women at the International Space Station because only one of the appropriate space suits on board would properly fit a woman.

Astronauts Anne McClain and Christina Koch had been slated to make the historic walk together in space, but Koch had to pair off with male astronaut Nick Hague and the chance for the two women to make history was lost. Hague and McClain also had completed a spacewalk earlier in March, but that was not enough to blunt some of the public accusations that McLain had been cut from the later spacewalk because she is a lesbian.

According to NASA, the astronauts trained with various sized spacesuits, but the effect of microgravity changed the sizing preferences once in space. An ill-fitting spacesuit would make the job more difficult, and also, as you might well imagine, could present safety concerns.

NASA spokeswoman Stephanie Schierholz explained that spacesuits come in different sizes and configurations. “Working in a pressurized spacesuit requires physical strength and endurance, and it is essential that the spacesuit fits as well as possible,” she revealed. “An optimally fitted spacesuit improves an astronaut’s ability to accomplish the tasks.”

She explained, “We do our best to anticipate the spacesuit sizes that each astronaut will need, based on the spacesuit size they wore in training on the ground, and in some cases astronauts train in multiple sizes. However, the sizing needs of crew members may change when they are in orbit, in response to the changes living in microgravity can bring about in a body.”

That did nothing to blunt the criticism. Even former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton tweeted, “Make another suit,” which failed to recognize the difficulty of making modifications to the suit in the space station without taking needed time away from other essential missions assigned to the crew.

Other outraged critics also seemed to be unaware of some of the subtleties and complexities inherent in such a highly technical and complex operating environment. McClain, who is a lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army and a decorated combat pilot and engineer, said it was her decision not to participate in the spacewalk. “This decision was based on my recommendation,” she declared. “Leaders must make tough calls, and I am fortunate to work with a team who trusts my judgement.”

Down Here on Earth

No sooner did the space station incident hit newspaper headlines and network news than social media erupted with the anger of many women who said they had faced similar issues they felt amounted to discrimination against women employees by ignorant or deliberately callous employers. They cited incidents when equipment was so ill-fitting that it created dangers or simply made it extremely difficult to accomplish the tasks expected of them.

The ill-fitting equipment and clothing they described included bullet-proof vests, oversized work boots, hazmat suits, gloves and PPE equipment at construction sites—all designed to be worn only by an average-sized man. Adding to their anger was the fact that some employers regarded different-sized equipment for women as something that was not their responsibility and that in many cases the woman was expected to purchase it herself.

Your business may not operate in outer space, but under federal law employers are required to consider these issues when determining required PPE for their workplaces, and must make sure that the PPE properly fits the employee to ensure it provides the intended protection, says attorney Todd Logsdon of law firm Fisher Phillips.

“A diverse workforce can include employees of various sizes,” he adds. “An employer must not only ensure it has the proper PPE for the hazards of the workplace, but also that the PPE fits each of the employees who may need to use it.” This individual employer responsibility is recognized and written into federal workplace safety law and regulations, Logsdon points out.

To begin with, employers are required to conduct an assessment of the workplace to determine what hazards are present that necessitate the use of PPE. Then the employer must select the appropriate PPE to address the hazards, communicate that decision to the affected employees, and “select PPE that properly fits each affected employee,” federal regulations state.

Logsdon notes, “The reasons for having properly-sized PPE are obvious. Gloves that are too big may make it difficult for employees to grip or manipulate tools; chemical boots that are too big could create a trip hazard, and respirators that are too big will not have the proper seal to prevent contaminants from entering the facemask.”

Employers also should keep in mind that the employer is required to train the affected employees on when PPE is necessary, how to don, doff, adjust and wear the PPE, the limitations of the PPE, as well as the proper care and maintenance of the PPE, Logsdon warns.

In general, employers must provide the required PPE at no cost to the employee with a few exceptions. For example, the employer is not required to pay for general, non-specialty safety footwear and prescription eyewear that the employer allows workers to wear off-site.

Finally, the employer must remember to document and “certify” the hazard assessment, Logsdon stresses. Not doing so has proven costly for many employers. “Failing to be able to produce the certified hazard assessment is a common citation by OSHA.”

About the Author

David Sparkman

David Sparkman is founding editor of ACWI Advance (www.acwi.org), the newsletter of the American Chain of Warehouses Inc. He also heads David Sparkman Consulting, a Washington D.C. area public relations and communications firm. Prior to these he was director of industry relations for the International Warehouse Logistics Association. Sparkman has also been a freelance writer, specializing in logistics and freight transportation. He has served as vice president of communications for the American Moving and Storage Association, director of communications for the National Private Truck Council, and for two decades with American Trucking Associations on its weekly newspaper, Transport Topics.

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!