ASSE Suggest Changes To Proposed Confined Space Standard

July 25, 2008
American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE) member Gary Lopez, CSP, suggested changes for OSHA’s proposed Confined Spaces in Construction Standard, a rule he said is complicated, introduces unnecessary new terminology, inadequately addresses several important confined space issues and fails to recognize current, widely understood safety practices.

Lopez, senior director of safety for Ranger Construction Industries Inc. in West Palm Beach, Fla., a former member of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Z117 Accredited Standards Committee for Confined Space Entry and current chair of the ASSE standards development committee, testified on the proposed rule during an informal July 22 public hearing at the U.S. Department of Labor.

“What concerns me is what I fear may be a lack of full appreciation of the on-the-job realities ASSE’s members face every day as they strive to help workers protect themselves when entering confined spaces,” Lopez said. “I firmly believe that, if the writers of this proposed rule were in our shoes, they would have assumed a new way of looking at construction confined spaces separately from general industry – with new classifications, new terminology, new requirements – was not the way to address the confined space risks viewed as unique to the construction industry.”

He also noted the rule is not in harmony with the Z117.1-2003 voluntary consensus standard currently widely adopted throughout both general industry and construction and among safety and health professionals managing confined space hazards in workplaces countrywide.

Construction Risks “Less Predictable”

Lopez pointed out that confined spaces in general industry are no less hazardous to enter than in the construction industry.

“The real difference is the risks presented in construction are less predictable than in general industry,” he said. “This is because most general industry confined spaces are ‘fixed,’ meaning that they have either been entered before or have a history of use that helps in determining risks and precautions. As a result, they are easier to address during the entry permit risk assessment process.”

Lopez said the proposed rule does not take into account the reason a controlling contractor or host employer often retains a contractor is due to the contractor’s expertise in confined space entry. Giving the employer or contractor responsibility for information about the confined space makes little sense in such situations and could prove dangerous due to their lack of familiarity with the hazards.

“ASSE understands the difficult job OSHA has in moving forward rulemaking,” Lopez said. “We want to work with OSHA to help make sure this rulemaking can build on the successful ways our members and the voluntary consensus standards process help workers enter confined spaces safely.”

For more information on the proposed rule, which OSHA published in November 2007, read OSHA Seeks Comments on Confined Space Rule.

About the Author

Laura Walter

Laura Walter was formerly senior editor of EHS Today. She is a subject matter expert in EHS compliance and government issues and has covered a variety of topics relating to occupational safety and health. Her writing has earned awards from the American Society of Business Publication Editors (ASBPE), the Trade Association Business Publications International (TABPI) and APEX Awards for Publication Excellence. Her debut novel, Body of Stars (Dutton) was published in 2021.

Sponsored Recommendations

Ensuring a Safer Workplace through a Comprehensive Contractor Qualification Framework

March 13, 2025
Avetta is a leader in contractor management, and with over 15 years of industry experience, we can help you establish a robust contractor pre-qualification program that aligns...

EQT Private Equity to Acquire Avetta from WCAS

March 13, 2025
EQT commits to supporting Avetta in its ongoing growth and innovation journey.

Guide to OSHA Workplace Lighting Requirements

March 13, 2025
Learn OSHA workplace lighting requirements to enhance safety, productivity, and quality. Discover standards, compliance benefits, and risks of non-compliance.

What is the difference between Tier 1, 2, and 3 suppliers and why do they matter?

March 13, 2025
From raw materials to final products, each supplier tier poses risks and liabilities that can impact your organization. Avetta's supply chain management software offers peace ...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!