N.J. Chemical Plant "Worst-Case Scenario" Might Put Millions At Risk

May 26, 2006
A report released by the New Jersey Work Environment Council (WEC) has identified 110 facilities in 19 New Jersey counties that could potentially cause "catastrophic safety and health risks to workers or the public in the event of a worst-case chemical release."

The report the first of its kind to use data on potentially hazardous facilities in New Jersey from state and federal data sources details how a toxic release prompted by an accident or terrorist attack could cause serious harm not only to plant employees but also to up to 12 million people.

The impacted area potentially could extend into Manhattan, Staten Island and Brooklyn. In southern New Jersey, a chemical accident potentially could generate a cloud of chlorine gas covering 25 miles, reaching into downtown Philadelphia, the report says.

"There has always been a degree of risk associated with living near or around a chemical-handling facility, but in this post 9/11 world, we must recognize the need to safeguard ourselves against those who might attempt to use these facilities as weapons," WEC Executive Director Rick Engler said.

Report Raises 'Public Fear and Concern'

Elvin Montero, director of communication for the Chemistry Council of New Jersey, told Occupational Hazards.com that the information released is not new and that he doesn't approve of the way it has been published.

"I question if this report is putting safety and security first," he said. "This information has been made public since before 9/11, and it was done voluntarily by industry. This report unnecessarily raises public fear and concern."

Montero says much has to happen for the "worst-case" scenario to occur, as the "industry has and continues to work cooperatively" with federal regulators and others and is satisfied with security measures it has taken.

The group behind the study has asked New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine to conduct an assessment of chemical industry weaknesses, implement strict physical security standards and impose mandatory requirements in lieu of voluntary guidelines.

Engler admits there always could be risks, but they can be "minimized by adopting a few common-sense measures."

Sponsored Recommendations

Ensuring a Safer Workplace through a Comprehensive Contractor Qualification Framework

March 13, 2025
Avetta is a leader in contractor management, and with over 15 years of industry experience, we can help you establish a robust contractor pre-qualification program that aligns...

EQT Private Equity to Acquire Avetta from WCAS

March 13, 2025
EQT commits to supporting Avetta in its ongoing growth and innovation journey.

Guide to OSHA Workplace Lighting Requirements

March 13, 2025
Learn OSHA workplace lighting requirements to enhance safety, productivity, and quality. Discover standards, compliance benefits, and risks of non-compliance.

What is the difference between Tier 1, 2, and 3 suppliers and why do they matter?

March 13, 2025
From raw materials to final products, each supplier tier poses risks and liabilities that can impact your organization. Avetta's supply chain management software offers peace ...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!