Are Manufacturer's Recommendations the Best Solution?

Sept. 9, 2008
What does the term "manufacturers' recommendations" really mean in the real world?

What does the term "manufacturers' recommendations" really mean in the real world?

I’ve spent more than 35 years in safety, first as a compliance officer with Maryland OSHA, then as independent consultant. My work has given me the opportunity to review hundreds of written safety and health programs, on a wide range of topics in a plethora of industries ranging from small “mom and pop” operations to multinational conglomerates.

One thing I’ve noticed about many written programs is that they contained as statement like, "All equipment shall be maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations." Now that sounds perfectly reasonable, doesn't it? Who knows better than the manufacturer what maintenance is required?

After reviewing a fall protection or confined space program, I would ask, “What maintenance do you perform on your retracting lifelines or your toxic gas monitors?” I often was met with a blank – or at best – quizzical look.

When I saw that look, I would respond, “Well, it says right here that you “will maintain equipment according to the manufacturer’s recommendations,” so I'm asking you: what does the manufacturer recommend?” In most cases, I got a mindless shrug. Rarely could anyone track down the original manual or instructions.

What good does it do to have a high-minded requirement in a written program if there is no practical way of achieving the stated objective?

Perhaps it would be a better idea to replace the generic statement about manufacturers’ recommendations with a two-column table. The first column would list the frequency that particular maintenance operations are performed on equipment – for example, daily, weekly, monthly or annually. In the second column, the specific work to be performed should be listed.

This simple digest would stand a much better chance of being followed than some clichéd statement. Moreover, the table could be printed, laminated, fitted with a grommet and wired to the equipment so it is readily accessible for all users to follow.

Next time, I’ll discuss if it is a good idea to follow manufacturers’ recommendations with respect to calibrating toxic gas monitors.

John Rekus may be reached at [email protected].

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!