Thinkstock
Image

OSHA Seeks Legal Action for Wrongful Firing of Whistleblowers

Dec. 3, 2015
OSHA is requesting a jury trial for a company it found to have wrongfully discharged employees who filed health and safety complaints.

OSHA is requesting a jury trial for a company it found to have wrongfully discharged employees who filed health and safety complaints.

Eastern Awning Systems Inc., a Watertown, Conn.-based manufacturer of retractable fabric patio awnings, discharged two employees while OSHA was still investigating their complaints.

The two employees in question had filed reports in June 2009 with OSHA after falling ill from working in the company’s powder coat room. OSHA in December 2009 cited the company for willfully exposing the workers to inhalation hazards and for lack of adequate ventilation. However, by then, the employees already had been discharged.

The employees filed whistleblower complaints with OSHA, which in turn found the employees had been wrongfully discharged for filing health and safety complaints.

All attempts made to settle the situation without litigation were unsuccessful, according to OSHA. The case is being handled by Attorney Nathan C. Henderson of the Labor Department’s Boston office.

OSHA is asking the court to find that Eastern Awning Systems Inc. and Stephen P. Lukos – the company’s owner, president and director – wrongfully discharged the employees and order them to pay lost wages plus interest; pay compensatory for emotional distress; pay punitive damages; be prohibited from future such violations; post a workplace notice informing employees of their rights; and pay the cost of the lawsuit.

“This is a case where an employer willfully exposed its employees to workplace hazards, then compounded its unacceptable behavior by retaliating against these workers for exercising their rights to a healthy work environment,” said Kim Stille, OSHA’s New England regional administrator.

“The law is clear and so is our message to employers: You cannot discriminate against employees for filing complaints with OSHA or voicing concerns about hazardous conditions in the workplace. When employers take retaliatory actions as the defendants did here, we will pursue strong and appropriate remedies, including through legal action if needed” said Michael Felsen, the regional solicitor of labor for New England.

About the Author

Ginger Christ | Associate Editor

Ginger Christ is an associate editor for EHS Today, a Penton publication.

She has covered business news for the past seven years, working at daily and weekly newspapers and magazines in Ohio, including the Dayton Business Journal and Crain’s Cleveland Business.

Most recently, she covered transportation and leadership for IndustryWeek, a sister publication to EHS Today.

She holds a bachelor of arts in English and in Film Studies from the University of Pittsburgh.

Connect on Google+ | LinkedIn | Twitter

Sponsored Recommendations

April 25, 2025
Environmental audits should be a core part of your EHS program regardless of whether you choose to pursue ISO 14001 certification.
April 25, 2025
Streamline EHS inspections. Conduct, track, and manage inspections effortlessly with customizable checklists, real-time reporting, and actionable insights.
April 25, 2025
A winning business case is based on the ROI of the project. The essential first step is determining your EHS costs today.
April 25, 2025
The use of QR codes can greatly simplify observation, near miss, and incident reporting and improve the quantity and quality of data. The more safety information that is collected...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!