Getty Images
injury-reporting.jpg

California Changes Serious Injury Report Criteria

Dec. 5, 2019
Reports can no longer be filed via e-mail after Cal/OSHA opens a new website.

Lost in the welter of other high-profile employment laws recently enacted by the California State Legislature is a new requirement that changes the criteria for deciding what are serious jobsite occupational injuries, illnesses and deaths of workers that employers need to report to the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA).

Another new state law changes the methods by which employers are expected to file reports of these incidents. It eliminates the option for e-mail reporting once the agency opens a new online reporting website that it is currently working on. Even after the new website is up and operating, employers will still have the option of continuing to report via telephone. Both new laws will go into effect on Jan. 1, 2020.

One law, called AB 1805, amends the definition of “serious injury or illness” that is contained in state law by removing the 24-hour minimum time requirement for qualifying hospitalizations in cases where an employee suffers loss of a body part or suffers a serious degree of permanent disfigurement. The new law’s definition of these kinds of hospitalizations excludes stays for medical observation or diagnostic testing.

By deleting the time frame and simply mandating that reporting must occur when a worker’s injury requires hospitalization, legislators argue that the change will provide employers with added clarity when it comes to determining their reporting responsibilities.

Further, the law also replaces “loss of any member of the body” with “amputation,” and explicitly includes the loss of an eye as a qualifying injury. It eliminates the exclusion of an injury or illness caused by certain violations of the Penal Code, and narrows the inclusion of accidents on a public street or highway found to have occurred only in a construction zone.

In addition, AB 1805 revises the definition of “serious exposure” to dangerous chemicals. Under the amended law, a “serious exposure” encompasses the exposure of an employee to a hazardous substance in a degree or amount sufficient to create a “realistic possibility”—instead of the current “substantial probability”—that death or serious bodily harm could result from the “actual hazard created by” the exposure.

This change is consistent with establishing when a “serious violation” exists. When such a finding is made, it requires a faster response from Cal/OSHA, according to attorneys Matthew Deffebach, Mini Kapoor and Christina Gad of the law firm of Haynes and Boone LLP.

The other new law, AB 1804, changes the reporting requirement by directing employers to immediately report such incidents via telephone or through an online reporting mechanism that Cal/OSHA is in the process of creating, but which is not yet operational. Until the online reporting mechanism is available, employers will still be allowed to continue reporting serious accidents by both e-mail and telephone.

Employers should keep in mind that violations for failing to timely report a serious injury can result in a minimum fine of $5,000.

Legislators explained that the change in the law was prompted by complaints alleging that accident and injury reporting through e-mails has slowed accident investigations because Cal/OSHA may be getting incomplete information when it relies on this reporting method. They noted that during a telephone conversation, Cal/OSHA can ask for follow-up information—something that is not immediately available when using e-mail communications.

Also, by creating an online report portal, the legislators said that Cal/OSHA can prompt employers about the type of information that must be provided.

“Employers should re-evaluate their reporting procedures in light of these new obligations and monitor the Cal/OSHA website for announcements on when the new online reporting will be available,” Deffebach, Kapoor and Gad recommend.

About the Author

David Sparkman

David Sparkman is founding editor of ACWI Advance (www.acwi.org), the newsletter of the American Chain of Warehouses Inc. He also heads David Sparkman Consulting, a Washington D.C. area public relations and communications firm. Prior to these he was director of industry relations for the International Warehouse Logistics Association. Sparkman has also been a freelance writer, specializing in logistics and freight transportation. He has served as vice president of communications for the American Moving and Storage Association, director of communications for the National Private Truck Council, and for two decades with American Trucking Associations on its weekly newspaper, Transport Topics.

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!