NHCA Urges OSHA to Renew Focus on Noise Control

April 29, 2011
In a March 16 letter to OSHA, the National Hearing Conservation Association (NHCA) urged the agency to “renew its focus on noise control despite the current climate of economic adversity.”

OSHA withdrew its “Interpretation of OSHA’s Provisions for Feasible Administrative or Engineering Controls of Occupational Noise,” a proposal that would interpret guidelines emphasizing the use of engineering and administrative controls to mitigate occupational noise, in January. Some safety stakeholders expressed disappointment over this decision and suggested the withdrawal could have a negative impact on workers safety.

“The apparent reason for not enforcing the noise control requirements as specified in the original standard was the argument that a hearing conservation program could as effectively protect noise exposed workers at a much lower cost than designing and implementing noise control measures,” NHCA President Timothy Rink, Ph.D., wrote in the letter. “While an effective hearing conservation program may achieve this objective for some workers, a program designed to comply with the minimal requirements of the hearing conservation amendment to the noise standard may not.”

In the letter, NHCA outlined several advantages of noise control, including: the reduction of potential user error, negligence or deliberate non-compliance regarding the use of hearing protectors such as earplugs or earmuffs; improved hazard awareness and perception of safety alerts and warnings; reduction of the risk of life-altering hearing loss, tinnitus and other effects of excessive noise exposure; and the cost effectiveness of noise controls as a long-term strategy for addressing the hazard of excessive workplace noise.

“Consistent with other OSHA regulations, which stress the primacy of engineering controls in reducing the risks associated with chemical exposure, noise controls should also be foremost in the hierarchy of strategies to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss,” the letter explained. “OSHA’s intended return to an accurate definition of ‘feasible’ would have been a return to the original objective of the regulation by bringing the noise control regulation in line with other hazardous exposure regulations.”

Read NHCA’s letter to OSHA in its entirety here.

About the Author

Laura Walter

Laura Walter was formerly senior editor of EHS Today. She is a subject matter expert in EHS compliance and government issues and has covered a variety of topics relating to occupational safety and health. Her writing has earned awards from the American Society of Business Publication Editors (ASBPE), the Trade Association Business Publications International (TABPI) and APEX Awards for Publication Excellence. Her debut novel, Body of Stars (Dutton) was published in 2021.

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!