Surging Ergonomic Citations Draw Industry Ire

Aug. 14, 2003
Until recently, OSHA's pledge to pursue a vigorous enforcement policy against companies with ergonomic hazards struck critics as an empty promise. Federal OSHA did not issue a single ergonomic citation under the general duty clause (GDC) in 2001 or 2002.

Now it is industry representatives who are crying foul. With the year scarcely half over, OSHA has already come out with 10 GDC ergonomic citations.

More alarming still, says Jonathan Eisen of the National Coalition on Ergonomics, the agency appears to be targeting companies with excellent ergonomic programs, despite OSHA Administrator John Henshaw's promise that companies with active ergonomic programs would not be inspected.

"Henshaw said many times companies making a good faith effort should have no fear," complains Eisen. "Obviously there's a disconnect between what Washington is saying and what the field offices are doing." Eisen points to OSHA's citation of SUPERVALU Inc.'s Missouri warehouse facility as an example of the agency targeting a company with an effective ergonomic program.

Compounding industry fears of an enforcement strategy that no longer takes "yes" for an answer, SUPERVALU's corporate director of risk control, James Koskan, sits on the agency's own National Advisory Committee on Ergonomics (NACE).

"We're a little dumbfounded by the citation," commented Koskan. "I'm deemed one of the nation's [ergonomics] experts, and I would have chosen this particular facility as the poster child for what we're doing right. Apparently OSHA sees things differently."

Koskan said the company would contest the citation.

"We value the contributions of Mr. Koskan to the work of NACE, and we acknowledge that SUPERVALU has a good corporate ergonomics program," said an OSHA spokesperson. "However, in this case, the particular establishment in question did not have an effective ergonomics program in place and was cited for ergonomics hazards."

Chris Tampio, director of employment policy at the National Association of Manufacturers, echoed Eisen's complaints about OSHA's policy.

"I worry about what they will do next," said Tampio. "Will they go to Chrysler, Ford and GM and try to change their programs too?" After examining OSHA's detailed abatement suggestions, Eisen and Tampio argued that OSHA appears to be forcing companies to comply de facto with the rescinded Clinton ergonomics regulation.

OSHA suggested SUPERVALU use the following abatement methods:

  • Worksite analysis to recognize musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) hazards;
  • Medical management and accurate recordkeeping of MSDs;
  • Training and education for exposed employees;
  • Hazard prevention and control, e.g.: engineering, work practice and administrative controls, including the elimination of lifting items that weigh over 40 lbs.

Tampio added a second example of OSHA citing and fining a company that is doing "due diligence" in ergonomics: Tri-State Coca Cola Bottling Co.

"We have addressed ergonomics within our safety and health program for at least five years," explained company spokesperson Ashlie Brown. Although Tri-State lacks a stand-alone formal ergonomics program, she said the company provides two hours of safety training annually to its employees.

The fines OSHA is levying in its ergonomic citations are modest, according to Jackie Nowell, director of occupational safety and health at the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union. The figure for SUPERVALU is typical: $12,600.

What ties the two citations worrying NCE and NAM together is both have to do with material handling tasks, the lifting of heavy loads within a warehouse and off delivery trucks.

"I have to believe Anheuser-Busch and other companies that deliver products by truck are worried OSHA will knock on their door," explained Nowell. "It's a big problem, and big money to fix it."

On this point, Eisen and Nowell seem to agree. "We are not pleased with some of the abatement measures as they could be extraordinarily expensive," commented Eisen. "The fines are in some respects immaterial."

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!