Successful Worksite Health Programs Require Implementation and Management Support

Dec. 16, 2010
To meet their goal of lowering health care costs, worksite health promotion programs must be well implemented and have strong management support, reports the December Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

If either element is missing, health care costs may actually increase, according to an in-depth evaluation of health promotion programs and practices at PPG Industries. The lead author was Niranjana M. Kowlessar, Ph.D., of Thomson Reuters, Washington, D.C.

Researchers analyzed survey data from 37 PPG worksites, including specific evaluations of program implementation and management support. The relationship between these factors and the reduction in health care costs achieved by the worksite health promotion program was assessed.

At worksites with higher scores for either implementation or management support – but not both – health care costs actually went up after the health promotion program was introduced. The average increases were about $950 and $1,400 per employee per year, respectively.

In contrast, costs decreased at worksites with high scores for both implementation and management support, suggesting a significant “interaction effect.” At these sites, health care costs decreased by $1,900 per employee per year, compared to sites with low scores for both management and implementation.

Worksite health promotion programs can improve employee health, with the potential for reduced costs leading to a positive return-on-investment. However, some companies remain skeptical about the financial benefits. The new study seeks to identify critical elements of programs that are successful in reducing health care costs.

The new data from PPG suggest that good program implementation and strong management support are essential to achieving financial benefits from worksite health promotion programs. The study is an important step toward the goal of connecting “soft” measures of program effectiveness to “hard” measures of outcomes – particularly health care costs. The researchers encourage other companies to use similar surveys “to identify gaps in management support and program implementation that may influence program effectiveness.”

The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine is the official publication of the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM).

About the Author

Laura Walter

Laura Walter was formerly senior editor of EHS Today. She is a subject matter expert in EHS compliance and government issues and has covered a variety of topics relating to occupational safety and health. Her writing has earned awards from the American Society of Business Publication Editors (ASBPE), the Trade Association Business Publications International (TABPI) and APEX Awards for Publication Excellence. Her debut novel, Body of Stars (Dutton) was published in 2021.

Sponsored Recommendations

Ensuring a Safer Workplace through a Comprehensive Contractor Qualification Framework

March 13, 2025
Avetta is a leader in contractor management, and with over 15 years of industry experience, we can help you establish a robust contractor pre-qualification program that aligns...

EQT Private Equity to Acquire Avetta from WCAS

March 13, 2025
EQT commits to supporting Avetta in its ongoing growth and innovation journey.

Guide to OSHA Workplace Lighting Requirements

March 13, 2025
Learn OSHA workplace lighting requirements to enhance safety, productivity, and quality. Discover standards, compliance benefits, and risks of non-compliance.

What is the difference between Tier 1, 2, and 3 suppliers and why do they matter?

March 13, 2025
From raw materials to final products, each supplier tier poses risks and liabilities that can impact your organization. Avetta's supply chain management software offers peace ...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!