CDC Study: MRSA Infections Connected to Animal Agriculture

Dec. 5, 2007
Despite mounting evidence that demonstrates certain strains of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) originate in animal agriculture and could pose a threat to agriculture workers, the United States does not test for the disease in cattle, pigs or other livestock used for food.

A recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study reveals that the NT-MRSA, a strain of the affliction that first appeared in the Netherlands in 2003, makes up more than 20 percent of all MRSA cases in that country. NT-MRSA, which previously only affected pigs, has a high rate of hospitalization for humans.

In the Netherlands, NT-MRSA cases were prevalent in parts of the country containing pig and cattle farms, with pig and cattle farmers affected in especially high rates. Furthermore, Veterinary Microbiology recently published evidence of MRSA’s presence in Canadian pigs and pig farmers, suggesting animal agriculture industries may play a large role in harboring and spreading the disease, and that both animals and workers are at risk of infection.

Agricultural, medical and environmental experts urge Congress and the Food and Drug Administration to investigate MRSA’s connection to the agriculture industries and to determine if the nation’s cattle, poultry and swine may contribute to the spread of infection in humans.

Rebecca Goldburg, senior scientist at environmental defense, explained that the presence of antibiotics in animal feed could contribute to the problem.

“Antibiotic resistance is exploding in our hospitals and communities,” she said. “Medical experts point to the profligate use of antibiotics in animal feed as a significant cause, but those in charge of safeguarding our food system are mostly just whistling in the dark.”

In “The Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act,” a proposed bill supported by more than 350 health and agriculture groups, antibiotics relevant to human medicine would be phased out in their use as animal feed additives. The bill was sponsored by Senate Health Committee Chairman Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., along with Maine Republican Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins and Democratic Sens. Sherrod Brown, Ohio, and Jack Reed, R.I.

About the Author

Laura Walter

Laura Walter was formerly senior editor of EHS Today. She is a subject matter expert in EHS compliance and government issues and has covered a variety of topics relating to occupational safety and health. Her writing has earned awards from the American Society of Business Publication Editors (ASBPE), the Trade Association Business Publications International (TABPI) and APEX Awards for Publication Excellence. Her debut novel, Body of Stars (Dutton) was published in 2021.

Sponsored Recommendations

Elevating Safety: Empowering Supervisors to Become Safety Advocates

Aug. 27, 2024
Explore the skills, knowledge and techniques that supervisors need to effectively manage the safety of their crew. This guide will examine the causes and symptoms of supervisory...

Top 10 Causes of Distracted Driving—and What They All Have in Common

Aug. 27, 2024
The results reveal the top ten causes of distracted driving, and make it clear that not all distractions are created equal.

Providing the Best PPE is No Guarantee

Aug. 27, 2024
Advancements in PPE are impressive—better protection, comfort and style. But even if you’ve provided the best PPE, there is no guarantee it will be worn.

6 Qualities That Make a Safety Leader

Aug. 27, 2024
A strong safety culture depends on dedicated leaders. They are the people who spearhead the fight for a safer work environment. A good safety leader isn’t shy about bringing concerns...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!