Ehstoday Com Sites Ehstoday com Files Uploads 2012 07 Shift Schedules In North America

Which Is Better: 8-Hour Shifts vs. 12-Hour Shifts

Aug. 1, 2012
Which are better: 8-hour shifts or 12-hour shifts? Are certain shift lengths associated with greater employee satisfaction, better safety and higher productivity rates?

Which are better: 8-hour shifts or 12-hour shifts? Are certain shift lengths associated with greater employee satisfaction, better safety and higher productivity rates?

According to a survey by Circadian, there are no simple answers to those questions. Extensive scientific research on the effects of 8- and 12-hour shifts has produced no clear winner. Which works best depends on the facility, the type of work and, most importantly, if management has obtained employee buy-in. Companies across America are fairly evenly divided between 8- and 12-hour shifts: In a Circadian survey of 400 shiftwork operations, 37 percent were using 12-hour shifts while 34 percent were using 8-hour shifts.

According to Circadian, the “perfect” shift schedule for each facility depends on a large number of factors, including business needs, the nature of the job tasks performed and work force demographics and preferences.

The vast majority of shiftwork studies that compare accident and error rates before and after a schedule change found no difference between 8-hour shifts and 12-hour shifts. In one study, a decrease from three to two shift handovers per day following a switch from 8-hour shifts to 12-hour shifts was thought to have reduced operator error. On the other hand, two studies cited accumulated sleep debt and recommend against 12-hour shifts, especially schedules entailing more than three or four 12-hour shifts in a row.

What Matters

One thing most of the studies about length of shifts and their impact on work and workers agree upon is that the way an operation implements a shift schedule has a substantial impact on the employees’ acceptance of it. Employee participation and sense of control is crucial to their satisfaction with and attitude toward a new schedule.

Circadian notes that facilities in various industries reported positive results when employees participated in negotiating changes such as shift start and end times, provision of an extra break during 12-hour shifts and improved meal facilities at night. At one plant in which the schedule was imposed with no employee input, worker reactions were so negative that the old schedule had to be reinstated.

Circadian has developed a Shift Scheduling Optimization Process to help companies determine which schedule is right for your operation.

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

10 Facts About the State of Workplace Safety in the U.S.

July 12, 2024
Workplace safety in the U.S. has improved over the past 50 years, but progress has recently stalled. This report from the AFL-CIO highlights key challenges.

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!